U.S. Presidential Candidates Sharply Divided on Military Alliances

Voice of America reports that "U.S. presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump reiterated sharply opposing views on the issue of military support for American allies around the world, and for Japan and South Korea in particular, during their first televised debate on Monday."

"Clinton, the Democratic candidate, criticized past statements made by Republican nominee Trump that indicated he might withdraw troops from Asia unless allies more fairly compensate the U.S. for protection."

“'He has said repeatedly that he does not care if other nations got nuclear weapons, Japan, South Korea even Saudi Arabia,' said Clinton."

"Trump countered that his opponent was misrepresenting his position, which he indicated was about negotiating a better compensation deal for U.S. support."

"'All I said was they may have to defend themselves or they have to help us out. We are a country that owes $20 trillion, they have to help us out,' he said."

Military.com reports that "sparks flew during the first presidential debate between Republican Donald Trump and his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton over plans to defeat the Islamic State, nuclear proliferation and threats to cybersecurity, among other national-security issues."

"Trump quickly went on the offensive during the 90-minute televised debate moderated by NBC's Lester Holt on Monday night at Hofstra University in New York -- the first of three such events planned -- notably when he accused Clinton of sharing too much information by outlining a plan to defeat the terrorist group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS."

"'She's telling us how to fight ISIS,' Trump said. 'Just go to her website. She tells you how to fight ISIS on her website. I don't think Gen. Douglas MacArthur would like that too much.'"

"Clinton responded, 'At least I have a plan to fight ISIS.'"

12,000

Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf said Tuesday he was “deeply sorry” about the bank’s creation of more than 1.5 million bank accounts without customer authorization and added that the bank holding company’s board “has the tools to hold senior leadership accountable, including me and Carrie Tolstedt.”

Tolstedt and her planned departure from the bank with well over $100 million in stock and options has been the focus of ire by Democrats and consumer advocates. She was the head of Wells Fargo’s community banking division where the alleged wrongdoing occurred.

On Sept. 8, Wells Fargo agreed to pay $185 million to a pair of federal regulators, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and to the city and county of Los Angeles, which sued the bank over its sales practices.

In agreements with the regulators and Los Angeles, the company didn't admit guilt, but agreed to pay fines and to make changes in its sales practices and managerial oversight. In testimony, though, Stumpf acknowledged the company’s wrongdoing and apologized for it.

[Podcast: GOP Tries to Defang Agency That Fined Wells Fargo]

Stumpf made his comments at a hearing before the Senate Banking Committee. A House hearing on the bank’s sales practices is expected to occur later this month.

Senate Banking Chairman Richard C. Shelby of Alabama pinned at least some of the blame on the CFPB and the comptroller, noting that Los Angeles sued the bank for its practices last year, following a 2013 Los Angeles Times investigation.

“Where were the federal regulators?” Shelby asked. Since the practice dated to at least 2010, “Why did it take an LA Times report to uncover what should have been uncovered by regulators?”

News accounts have referred to Fortune magazine’s estimate that Tolstedt, who resigned as head of community banking in July, had Wells Fargo shares and options valued at $124.6 million. Wells Fargo shares have since dipped and Tolstedt’s shares, if she hasn’t sold them, have fallen in value by nearly $10 million. The drop in stock value moved Wells Fargo down into second place in market value among American banks, now surpassed by JPMorgan Chase.

“I am deeply sorry that we failed to fulfill our responsibility to our customers, to our team members, and to the American public,” Stumpf told senators. He also said that Tolstedt got no severance benefits.

[Wall Street Eyes Dodd-Frank Changes in Spending Bill]

In a written statement, Stumpf said, “I want to apologize to all Wells Fargo customers. I want to apologize for violating the trust our customers have invested in Wells Fargo. And I want to apologize for not doing more sooner to address the causes of this unacceptable activity.”

“I do want to make very clear that there was no orchestrated effort, or scheme as some have called it, by the company,” he said in his prepared remarks. “We have never directed nor wanted our employees, whom we refer to as team members, to provide products and services to customers they did not want or need.”

Stumpf also said that Wells Fargo would expand its review of its sales practices to include 2009 and 2010.

Wells Fargo’s own analysis, according to the CFPB, found that between May 2011 and July 2015 its employees had opened 1,534,280 bank accounts that may not have been authorized. About 85,000 of the accounts incurred about $2 million in overdraft, monthly service and other fees, which the bank is refunding, the CFPB consent order said.

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.

12,000