- Rand Paul's 'Long Haul' Cut Short
- Bernie Sanders as GOP Tool: Their Plan to Use Him Against Democrats
- Can Rubio Follow Romneys Path to the Nomination?
- Why Was Fiorina Denied Ad Time During the Debate?
- What the Hell Happened to Jeb Bush?
Ambassador Susan E. Rice’s withdrawal from consideration to be President Barack Obama’s next secretary of State shifts the spotlight squarely onto Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., the other name most frequently mentioned as a replacement for Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Rice, currently the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, withdrew her name Thursday in a letter to the president, citing the fierce Republican opposition in the Senate.
“The position of Secretary of State should never be politicized,” she wrote. “As someone who grew up in an era of comparative bipartisanship and as a sitting national security official who has served in two U.S. administrations, I am saddened that we have reached this point, even before you have decided whom to nominate.”
Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill had differing reactions to Rice’s decision, but seemed to be in unison on who the president should choose.
“John Kerry would have a lot of bipartisan support,” Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill., said Thursday when asked whom Obama should nominate. “He’s done a great job in so many different ways for this country.” He added, “The president trusts him. I trust him. I think he’s done a great job.”
“We all know Senator Kerry very well,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said. “I think he’d be likely to be confirmed for whatever the president nominated him for.”
Asked if Kerry, the Democrats’ 2004 presidential nominee, was now Clinton’s heir apparent at Foggy Bottom, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, responded, “It looks that way.”
And while he was fulsome in his praise of Kerry, Harkin also noted that there is another reason Republicans are fans of the idea — it would prompt a special election to fill Kerry’s Massachusetts Senate seat. That’s one reason it’s far from certain that the administration will turn to Kerry, whom Obama passed over four years ago. But with Rice falling off the list, it will only heat up the speculation surrounding Kerry, a Vietnam war veteran and an occasional envoy for the president in hotspots such as Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Kerry put out a statement late Thursday praising Rice, calling her “an extraordinarily capable and dedicated public servant.”
“As someone who has weathered my share of political attacks and understands on a personal level just how difficult politics can be, I’ve felt for her throughout these last difficult weeks,” he said, “but I also know that she will continue to serve with great passion and distinction.”
The opposition to the Rice nomination was spearheaded by Senate Armed Services ranking member John McCain of Arizona and his colleagues, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire.
The trio focused their critique on comments Rice made in a series of national television interviews in the wake of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Rice appeared to play down the terrorist element of the attack in her comments based on talking points provided to officials by the intelligence community. They and other Republicans pointed to it as evidence that Rice is willing to put politics over national security realities.