The Air Forceís long-stalled effort to replace its fleet of Eisenhower-era aerial refueling tankers has become a poster child for the disruption caused by funding the Defense Department through a yearlong continuing resolution while the Pentagon sheds $46 billion in across-the-board sequester cuts at the same time.
After languishing for the better part of a decade, the Boeing Co. program is getting under way in earnest, with plans to deliver the first batch of 18 militarized 767s to the Air Force by 2017. As such, the program is on a steep upward funding slope, with its budget expected to grow from $877 million last year to $1.8 billion this year.
The Air Force considers the tanker its top procurement priority and, in a summary of its fiscal 2013 budget request, stated that itís not a true global force without a full fleet of tankers, which refuel combat aircraft in midair.
But a simple extension of the continuing resolution would hold the KC-46A tanker, in its research and development stage, at $877 million. That doesnít even factor in the sequester, which would cut another 9 percent from the tankerís budget this year, reducing it to $800 million ó or $1 billion below the fiscal 2013 request.
The budget proposal offered Monday by House Appropriations Chairman Harold Rogers, R-Ky., would restore most of that money and help to keep the ambitious effort to replace the Air Forceís venerable fleet of KC-135 refueling tankers largely on track.
The House bill (HR 933) would fund the tanker at $1.7 billion, just slightly below the administrationís request. The sequester would trim another $150 million from the program ó but thatís still a far cry from the $1 billion that would be slashed from the tanker if it is hit by both a continuing resolution and the sequester.
Rep. Bill Cassidy has his blood drawn by Alesha Barbour during a free hepatitis screening in the Rayburn House Office Building hosted by the Congressional Viral Hepatitis Caucus to recognize "National Viral Hepatitis Testing Day."
Roll Call has launched a new feature, Hill Navigator, to advise congressional staffers and would-be staffers on how to manage workplace issues on Capitol Hill. Please send us your questions anything from office etiquette, to handling awkward moments, to what happens when the work life gets too personal. Submissions will be treated anonymously.