- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
“The Amash amendment sacrifices our national security in order to coddle foreign enemy combatants … never in our nation’s history have we granted enemy combatants who attack our homeland during a time of war the same rights and privileges of American citizens, but that’s exactly what the Amash amendment would do,” Rooney said in a statement.
Rooney, a former military prosecutor, ripped into his colleague as the House prepared to debate Amash’s bipartisan amendment to the defense reauthorization bill that would eliminate the authority of the military to indefinitely detain individuals suspected of being terrorists who were caught within the United States.
On Wednesday, Amash and House Armed Services ranking member Adam Smith (D-Wash.) defended their amendment, arguing that the detention authority represents an unnecessary and dangerous encroachment on the civil liberties of Americans.
The detention authority “is an extreme amount of power to grant to the executive branch … leaving it on our books is an unnecessary threat to our civil liberties,” Smith said Wednesday.
Smith also dismissed arguments that the authority is necessary to combat terrorism. “That simply isn’t true,” Smith said, noting that hundreds of terrorists have been prosecuted and convicted in domestic courts during the past decade.
Likewise, Amash defended the amendment, arguing that he had “heard from Republicans and Democrats and Independents on this issue” during recent town halls and that, as it stands, the reauthorization bill “does not have the protections we need.”