Feb. 11, 2016 SIGN IN | REGISTER

The Economic Case for Permitting Crude Oil Exports | Commentary

Since the gasoline shortages of the 1970s, Congress has, with only a few exceptions, barred all U.S. crude oil exports. But an energy policy that may have made sense 40 years ago no longer does. Innovative drilling techniques have spawned an oil and natural gas boom in the United States. Since oil surpluses can create as many problems as oil shortages, itís time to eliminate those export restrictions.

The good news is that Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz has indicated that it may be time to rethink the export ban on crude oil, though he recently downplayed the change. And Senator Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, the top Republican on the Senate Energy Committee, just called for an end to the exporting ban and released a paper to encourage Senate discussion.

But defenders of the ban still argue that lifting it would hurt U.S. businesses and economic growth. Not so. Allowing oil ó as well as natural gas ó exports would lower energy prices, increase supply and improve U.S. security. Hereís why.

New Markets Would Mean More Stable Supply. The U.S. Energy Information Administration, a government agency, just announced, ďRising crude oil production in the United States contributed to relatively stable global crude oil prices in 2013, around the same annual average levels of the previous two years.Ē Allowing crude oil exports would encourage even more production, which has the effect of stabilizing both the supply and the price.

Huge Economic Benefits. States that are exploiting oil and natural gas drilling, which is mostly done on private land, have seen economic explosions. For example, North Dakota is at the epicenter of the drilling boom. Its unemployment rate is 2.7 percent, compared to 7 percent for the country. Those states canít find enough workers, especially blue-collar, so wages have gone up rapidly. That rapid rise is good, but it can create economic distortions, such as very expensive housing and strains on public education. If the federal government allowed more drilling on federal land and offshore, more states could participate in the energy boom, creating job opportunities at home. Itís our best immediate way to address concerns about income inequality and strengthening the middle class.

Swelling Government Revenues. Those states that have embraced the oil and gas boom are improving their budgets rapidly. In 2013 Texas received about $8.8 billion in oil and gas royalties and taxes. If the Obama administration opened up millions of acres of federal land and offshore regions to drilling, it would create a huge new federal revenue stream. Congress could take a lesson from Alaska by returning that money to the public, perhaps in the form of a contribution to a personal retirement account. Such accounts would give everyone a direct stake in a successful energy sector.

Lowers the Trade Deficit. The U.S. currently imports about 235 million barrels of crude oil a month, down from more than 300 million six years ago ó thanks to the drilling explosion and reduced consumption. At $100 a barrel, thatís about $23 billion of our monthly trade deficit. However, estimates suggest the U.S. will be a net oil exporter in five to seven years. Exporting that surplus would reduce the trade deficit even more.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?