Oct. 25, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Enter to Win Roll Call's 2014 Election Contest!

Tanner: Getting to Yes — the Case for a Centrist ‘Super Committee’

President Barack Obama’s signature is now dry on the hard-fought Budget Control Act of 2011. So where’s the victory lap? Where are the pundits jockeying to take credit?

The Budget Control Act was certainly hard-fought, but no one seems to be saying it was hard-won. Indeed, journalists and political observers across the country have noted that no one is clamoring to step to the microphone to claim victory — a sure sign that no one group, individual or political party feels as if it “won” anything.

Having served in the House for more than two decades and navigated a political minefield or two in my time, I can guarantee that few if any of my former colleagues sent out press releases proudly announcing their “yes” votes, using glowing words like “success,” “achievement” and “victory.”

Instead they penned carefully nuanced documents, gingerly explaining their position and the difficulty of the fiscal climate in which we are living to an electorate that had become increasingly hostile to the Congress in which they serve.

According to a Gallup poll conducted in the midst of the debt ceiling debate, two-thirds of the respondents indicated that their Representatives should vote for a compromise bill, even if it was one with which they disagreed. Not surprisingly, the electoral group that felt the strongest about compromise was the holy grail of voters — independents supported compromise by a rate of 72 percent. But clear majorities of both political parties favored a compromise solution, and they got what they wanted. No one’s happy about it, but compromise was the victor. Will it get to take a victory lap?

The key to compromise, and success, is the word “yes.” “Yes, we can agree to that.” “Yes, we can live with that.” America, and the rest of the world that relies on our economy, was saved from the brink of uncertain economic disaster not by partisan ideologues who wake up in the morning finding ways to say “no,” but by the coalition of brave moderate Democratic and Republican Members in the House and Senate who were intent on getting to “yes.”

Now we come to the part of the process where each side gets to pick its members for the “super committee.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) each select three members to serve on the Joint Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with returning a legislative proposal to Congress by Thanksgiving that will accomplish the goal of an additional $1.5 trillion trim to the deficit, lest the trigger mechanism is invoked.

The goal of deficit reduction is one with which no one disagrees. Of course, each side has priorities it will vigorously fight to protect and has already claimed are non-negotiable, prematurely hogtying the opportunity for compromise.

Sadly, the partisan priorities that so deeply entrench the left and right wings of the political spectrum will be exactly the force that ends in failure of the super committee.

comments powered by Disqus

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?