The House Judiciary Committee, which would be the natural home for Lofgren’s bill, was actually on the verge of expanding the CFAA’s provisions earlier this month, before a diverse coalition of advocacy groups including Demand Progress, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, FreedomWorks and Americans for Tax Reform succeeded in rallying the opposition. Critics of the CFAA took that as a victory, and a Democratic aide said the rapid withdrawal of the bill shows that the Judiciary Committee’s leadership is at least looking at action on the issue.
While many Internet activists view the CFAA and its punishments as draconian, law enforcement and prosecutors steadily maintain that the current tools they have to deal with cyber-criminals are inadequate. Those views are also why prosecutors are unlikely to heed congressional calls that they limit prosecutions of certain violations, which have risen with the increasing recognition that legislative action is unlikely.
James Jones, communications director for DC Vote, tapes a "DC Constituents Service Day" sign on the wall as he stands with other DC residents outside of Rep. Andy Harris's office on Capitol Hill to protest Harris' actions against D.C.'s marijuana laws on Thursday, July 24, 2014. DC Vote encouraged DC residents to bring their complaints about city services to the Maryland congressman.