- Why was Fiorina Denied Ad Time During the Debate?
- What the Hell Happened to Jeb Bush?
- Pelosi, DCCC Use Tea Party to Fire Up Dem Voters
- Anti-Abortion Groups to GOP: Include Fiorina in Debate
- Obamacare Repeal Votes Motivate Democratic Donors
Missouri Republican Sen. Roy Blunt said on the Senate floor that the federal government should indeed help but that $60.4 billion proposal “is not the best way to deal with this at this time.” He pushed for the GOP alternative on the Senate floor that would offer money for immediate response efforts now, absent of mitigation costs, and weigh future costs later.
“Eventually, we may spend more than $60.4 billion, but my view would be there are probably better ways to approach this than appropriating that money right now as opposed to appropriating it later when we really know what it’s for,” he said.
Blunt noted that aid for Hurricane Katrina recovery came in the form of three supplemental spending measures.
Meanwhile, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., doubted the bill’s prospects in the House, where fiscal cliff negotiations are taking priority. “It doesn’t seem to be going anywhere,” he said.
Senate Democrats appear increasingly anxious to woo the needed GOP support.
Senate passage of a broad-ranging measure would at the least strengthen the hand of Senate Democrats if they end up in conference negotiations on a final bill, one of the paths forward for the measure. A scaled-back version of the Sandy bill might also end up attached to a final year-end wrap-up measure addressing the fiscal cliff of looming tax cuts and automatic spending cuts.
The more expansive $60.4 billion measure has faced criticism from Republicans in both chambers, with Sen. Dan Coats of Indiana, a senior GOP appropriator, on Wednesday offering the slimmed-back Republican alternative intended to address the immediate needs of communities hit hard by the late October storm.
Reid introduced a new version of the $60.4 billion measure on Wednesday night that served at least two purposes. It effectively forced the Senate to start over on the bill, eclipsing a procedural tactic that Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., had attempted to use to make greater changes in how disaster relief is handled in the United States.
The new Democratic measure was little changed from the previous one, but it did contain what Republicans see as a sweetener to draw votes from those in the party whose own regions have had recent setbacks. Both measures include $17 billion for the Community Development Fund, with $100 million intended in the original measure for regions that suffered major disasters or for aiding “small, economically distressed areas” with perhaps less severe calamities declared in 2011 and 2012. The new amendment bumps this figure to $500 million, which could have the effect of making such funds more widely available.
Sarah Chacko contributed to this report.