Republicans quickly criticized President Barack Obama’s $447 billion jobs package for emphasizing short-term measures over long-term reforms, but they cautioned that they need to see the details and held out hope they could work with the president on pieces of his plan.
The GOP’s response was unusually scattershot — hamstrung in part by the lack of details laid out by the president, particularly on how he intends to pay for the plan.
And, as Obama and Congressional Democrats repeatedly noted, many of the ideas he put forward — like a proposal to cut the payroll tax for employees and small businesses — have previously been backed by Republicans in one form or another.
House Republican leaders stressed the need to find common ground and suggested they could do so by individually voting on some proposals that both they and the president could agree on.
Majority Leader Eric Cantor singled out small-business tax relief and streamlining the process for infrastructure spending as two initiatives he could individually support.
“I’d certainly like to see us be able to peel off some of these ideas, put them on the floor, vote them across the floor, get the Senate to join us so we can actually get something to the president,” the Virginia Republican said.
Speaker John Boehner issued a conciliatory statement after the speech. The Ohio Republican said that Obama’s proposals “merit consideration” and that he hopes Obama considers GOP ideas as well.
“It’s my hope that we can work together to end the uncertainty facing families and small businesses, and create a better environment for long-term economic growth and private-sector job creation,” Boehner said.
Many GOP lawmakers fretted that the plan would blow a hole in the deficit despite Obama saying he would offer a week from Monday a deficit-cutting proposal that would more than pay for it. And they said many of the ideas seemed like recycled proposals that have been tried before without much success.
“It seemed a little desperate to me, unfortunately,” said Sen. John Cornyn (Texas), the Senate GOP’s campaign chief.
“Most of what he was recommending were things that were attempted before and frankly didn’t work. ... This is more designed to help his poll numbers more than anything else,” he added.
“To me it was very much a kickoff to his campaign,” said Sen. John Thune (S.D.), the No. 4 Senate Republican, who added that the proposal seemed like “Stimulus II.”
“This was a speech designed to play to an audience around the country to demonstrate that he’s out there, that he’s being decisive, that he’s leading, that he’s got a plan — all of which are big question marks,” Thune added.
Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), a member of the Joint Committee on Deficit Reduction, wasn’t sold.
“The select committee has a short period of time to tackle our overspending and deficit problems, and the bulk of the president’s proposals tonight would move us in the wrong direction,” the Pennsylvania Republican said.
Republicans weren’t the only ones wondering who would be paying the bill.
“I’m interested in how he’s going to pay for it all,” said Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who also sits on the deficit committee. “It adds to our challenge.”
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.