Politics

Grassley Opens Door to Lame Duck Action on SCOTUS Nominee

Senate Republicans have so far blocked a hearing or vote on Merrick Garland

Iowa Sen. Charles E. Grassley has hinted that he might be open to a hearing and confirmation vote for Judge Merrick Garland during the lame duck session after Election Day. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles E. Grassley signaled that he is open to possibly acting on President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee after the November elections.

Republican leaders have pledged not to take up the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland, though a few senators have raised the possibility of a hearing or confirmation vote during a lame duck session between Election Day and when the new Congress is seated in January.

Obama nominated Garland, currently the chief judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, on March 16 to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

"[If] we have the election and the majority of the Senate changed their mind about doing it in the lame duck as opposed to Jan. 20, I don't feel that I could stand in the way of that," Grassley said at a town hall meeting in Cherokee, Iowa, on Monday. "But I don't think I can promote that idea."

[Reid: Democrats Considering Forcing Votes on Supreme Court Nominee]

The Globe Gazette in Mason City, Iowa, also reported that Grassley made similar remarks at a meeting in Sioux City. 

A spokeswoman for Grassley on the Judiciary Committee said the chairman at the Sioux City town hall reiterated the stance previously made in a Feb. 23 letter, signed by all the panel's Republicans, that a Supreme Court nominee wouldn't be considered until after the next president is sworn in.

"Giving the people a voice is the position of 52 of 54 Republican senators and he doesn't foresee any shift in that position," said Beth Levine, Grassley's Judiciary spokeswoman.

The Democratic super PAC American Bridge 21st Century captured video of Grassley's comments at the meeting in Cherokee.

Shortly after Scalia died in February, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Obama's nominee would not be confirmed, and that voters would decide the ideological direction of the court through the presidential election. Grassley concurred, and all of the Judiciary Committee's Republicans signed a letter stating that they would not hold hearings on a Supreme Court nominee until a new president takes office.

[Meet Merrick Garland: Next Justice or Historical Footnote?]

But some within the GOP, most notably Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona, are considering pushing for Garland's confirmation should Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton win the White House in November. Their thinking is that Clinton would nominate someone who is more liberal than Garland.

McConnell has argued that Garland is not a judicial moderate. But Grassley's recent comments indicate that the Judiciary Committee could act on its own, hold hearings and vote on the nominee.

Niels Lesniewski and Todd Ruger contributed to this report.

Contact Bowman at bridgetbowman@rollcall.com and follow her on Twitter at @bridgetbhc.

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.