Opponents of the health care law’s tax on medical devices say they are making headway in their push to repeal the provision before it takes effect next year. But some see delaying the implementation of the tax as a way to get around concerns about the cost of eliminating it if they’re unable to fully repeal it before the end of the session.
Rep. Erik Paulsen, the sponsor of the House repeal measure (HR 436), said he thinks there is a real possibility of wrapping repeal into the end-of-the-year budget negotiations. The Minnesota Republican and device industry advocates pointed to growing support among Senate Democrats, and Paulsen said there has been a bipartisan effort in that chamber to raise the issue with leadership.
“I think the chances of it being included are just as great as the chance of a final deal coming together before the holidays,” said Paulsen, whose state is home to a number of medical-device companies. “The one bright spot that sort of seems to stick out is that there’s bipartisan support in both bodies now. And that is important.”
The House passed Paulsen’s bill to repeal the 2.3 percent excise tax on medical devices in June, with support from 37 Democrats. But the effort stalled in the Democrat-led Senate, which has had little appetite for measures that repeal provisions of the 2010 health care law (PL 111-148, PL 111-152).
The tax goes into effect Jan. 1, and the IRS released the final rule for it last week.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor indicated on Fox News last month that he sees the deficit reduction negotiations as an opportunity to address the issue. The Virginia Republican said the tax would hurt job growth and could cause individuals to lose access to certain treatments.
There has also been an energetic advocacy effort pushing Congress to clear legislation that would abolish the tax before the end of the year. On Nov. 13, more than 800 organizations, companies and others sent a letter to Senate leaders in both parties calling on the chamber to repeal the tax before it goes into effect. They said the tax “will stifle innovation and cost thousands of high-paying jobs” as well as increase health care costs.
The Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) is running digital advertisements in Capitol Hill publications, pressing for repeal of the device tax. And last month, the group co-hosted a fly-in with the Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance and the Medical Device Manufacturers Association that included more than 60 meetings on Capitol Hill.
But even though opponents seek full repeal of the tax, AdvaMed chief lobbyist JC Scott said there’s recognition that only a couple of weeks remain in the year. If advocates are unsuccessful in the lame duck, he said, delay “may be a viable outcome” so full repeal can be considered next year as part of a tax overhaul.
Paulsen also sees that scenario as a possibility, particularly because of the cost attached to eliminating that part of the health care law. According to a Congressional Budget Office estimate released in June, repealing the tax would cost more than $29 billion over 10 years. House Republicans offset the costs of the repeal language and other provisions that were incorporated into Paulsen’s bill for floor consideration by removing limits on reclaiming overpayments of subsidies under the overhaul.
Rep. Bill Cassidy has his blood drawn by Alesha Barbour during a free hepatitis screening in the Rayburn House Office Building hosted by the Congressional Viral Hepatitis Caucus to recognize "National Viral Hepatitis Testing Day."
Roll Call has launched a new feature, Hill Navigator, to advise congressional staffers and would-be staffers on how to manage workplace issues on Capitol Hill. Please send us your questions anything from office etiquette, to handling awkward moments, to what happens when the work life gets too personal. Submissions will be treated anonymously.