The triumph of deliberation in the course of making law nearly always draws praise from future historians, but it can be awfully unpopular amid real-time cries for change.
While proponents of quick-fix legislation express frustration over Senate Judiciary Committee’s decision to halt work on a bill, I see a legislative process alert to the risks involved in enacting wholesale change to the greatest innovation engine the world has ever known — the U.S. patent system — without taking the time to get it right.
Clearly, Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., did the right thing in recognizing, as he put it, that provisions in the bill could hurt “the companies and universities who rely on the patent system every day to protect their inventions.”
Many lawmakers may have been unclear about the effects of legislation passed in the House and under consideration in the Senate, but they can look to two centuries of solid evidence testifying to the patent-system benefits at stake.
James Madison and other founders understood the importance of providing incentives for innovation, which is why they wrote into the Constitution protection for intellectual property and inventors’ exclusive rights to their creations for a limited time. Abraham Lincoln, another champion of the patent system and the only American president awarded a patent, recognized the role patents played spurring American economic growth and ingenuity, how they “added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius.” And Mark Twain, that prescient observer of life at home and abroad, wrote that “a country without a patent office and good patent laws was just a crab and couldn’t travel anyway but sideways and backwards.”
If Madison and Lincoln were around today, they would see that patent-fueled innovation continues to be a principal driver of economic growth and job creation. I think they would take pride in how much the rest of the world now recognizes that an efficient and balanced patent system is centered on strong patent protection that delivers innovation to the marketplace. As a 2012 study by the Economics and Statistics Administration and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reported, IP-intensive industries accounted for 40 million jobs, or 27.7 percent of all jobs in the U.S. economy, in 2010.
According to that same study, IP-intensive industries accounted for over $5 trillion in value added, or 34.8 percent of US GDP in 2010. The numbers aside, Presidents Lincoln and Madison would be astonished by the inventions kindled by the culture of innovation created by our strong IP laws — inventions like the electric sports car, 3-D printing, and even a tiny device designed by a small California company that, when placed in your cheek, can stop a headache with the flick of a switch.
As for Twain, I suspect he’d be having a field day poking fun at the stampede toward potential evisceration of IP protection in response to fears about “patent trolls.”
They may sound like characters from American tall tales, yet we know too well the term has become a popular pejorative for companies that don’t make products, and instead commercialize patents by licensing technology to practicing companies that manufacture products.
Terri Henderson, 6, center, whose mother is El Salvador, attends a rally with members of Congress at Union Station's Columbus Circle to announce the Restore Opportunity, Strengthen, and Improve the Economy (ROSIE) Act on July 29, 2014. The legislation provides incentives for government contractors to pay a living wage and other benefits that would help low-income workers.