Nov. 24, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Roll Call Casualty List: See Which Incumbents Lost | Check Results Here With Our Interactive Elections Map | Sign Up for Roll Call Newsletters

Modest Bill's Success Sets Stage for Bolder Effort

Energy efficiency, which typically enjoys strong bipartisan backing, has been caught in recent hyperpartisan battling

Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call File Photo
Shaheen and Portman worked for 18 months to build support for their comprehensive energy efficiency measure.

Late in the afternoon on Dec. 6, the Senate did something unlikely — it unanimously cleared an energy bill.

Perhaps more striking was the lopsided 398-2 vote in the House a day earlier to pass the same measure (HR 6582).

While the package of energy efficiency provisions was decidedly modest in scope, its success was still notable given the political gridlock surrounding energy policy in the 112th Congress. Supporters see it as a foundation on which the next Congress can build.

“Energy efficiency can bridge the partisan divide,” Alliance to Save Energy President Kateri Callahan said.

The bill mandates technical changes to federal energy efficiency standards for appliances such as water heaters and requires better coordination of Energy Department research programs. Yet, enacting even this bare-bones legislation required months of behind-the-scenes maneuvering , underscoring just how bitter the debate over energy policy has become.

Efficiency, long considered the “low-hanging fruit” when it comes to reducing energy demand, and consequently greenhouse gas emissions, has typically enjoyed strong bipartisan backing.

“When you think about those ways and those areas we can actually make a difference with energy and cost of energy, it’s by using less,” Alaska GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who co-authored part of the bill headed to President Barack Obama’s desk, said last week. “It’s just so straightforward.”

Regardless of political persuasion or geography, “everybody benefits from efficiency,” Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., told reporters last month. “It’s a no-brainer.”

Yet, in the past two years, even efficiency got caught up in the hyperpartisan fighting over Solyndra, the economic stimulus and Obama’s “war on coal.” GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a tea party favorite, set the tone during a March 2011 hearing in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, when he railed against federal efficiency standards that he blamed for poorly flushing toilets and expensive light bulbs.

“I blame you and people like you who want to tell me what I can install in my house,” he lectured an Energy Department witness.

Egged on by Rush Limbaugh and other conservatives, House Republicans last December insisted that an omnibus appropriations bill include a policy rider barring new efficiency standards for light bulbs from taking effect as scheduled in January. Obama ultimately signed the prohibition, and it continues over objections of the lighting industry, which had helped negotiate the standards enacted in 2007 with bipartisan support and signed into law by President George W. Bush.

Adding insult to injury, one of the Republicans leading the push to repeal the lighting standards, Rep. Michael C. Burgess of Texas, is an honorary vice chairman of the Alliance to Save Energy, which played a central role in getting the standards enacted.

comments powered by Disqus

Chart

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?