The top Senate Republican is calling on the House to send over legislation to repeal the health care law’s tax on medical devices, following a bipartisan vote among senators in favor of such a move last week.
Appearing Monday evening on the Hugh Hewitt radio show along with Florida GOP Sen. Marco Rubio, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he thought House Republicans should pass a stand-alone repeal of the medical-device tax to see how the Senate would handle it. His chamber voted 79-20 to demonstrate support for abolishing the 2.3 percent excise tax on March 21 as an amendment to the fiscal 2014 Senate budget resolution (S Con Res 8). Thirty-three Democrats and independent Angus King of Maine joined all Republicans in supporting the measure offered by Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah.
“I think if the House sent us a stand-alone medical device tax, it’s going to be really fascinating to see all these liberal Democrats figure out how they’re going to deal with it,” McConnell said, according to a transcript. “And I think the House now, the Senate having voted the way it did, should send us a bill to do precisely that very soon.”
McConnell noted that while the vote itself on an amendment to the budget plan was non-binding, it signaled overwhelming support that could box in Democrats down the road.
“Seventy-nine members of the United States Senate, including some very liberal Democrats like Elizabeth Warren, actually voted to repeal the medical device tax, so that’s a signal that when we come back to it on a bill that can actually become law, it’s going to be very difficult for them to explain why they voted to repeal it on one occasion and don’t vote to repeal it on another,” McConnell said. “So I think there’s no way you can overstate the significance of that.”
The radio interview came after Rubio gave a lengthy and wide-ranging speech at the minority leader’s namesake McConnell Center at the University of Louisville.
Of course, a number of issues complicate the repeal effort, starting with the price tag for taking the provision off the books. According to a Congressional Budget Office estimate from June, repealing the tax would cost more than $29 billion over 10 years. That means supporters would be under pressure to find an offset amenable to both parties, or Democrats who voted for the budget amendment could withhold their support for another repeal measure based on the pay-for.
There’s also the question of whether the House would send legislation to repeal the tax to the Senate before it passes a comprehensive tax overhaul. Rep. Peter Roskam, R-Ill., responded to the issue in another interview on the radio show Monday, maintaining that the repeal effort and the larger tax effort are not mutually exclusive.
“If there’s a decision that gets made, it can happen in a matter of weeks or months. It’s just a matter of calendar, timing, a decision from a strategic point of view to move forward, and the likelihood of getting it actually through the Senate, as opposed to some sort of game that the Senate has,” Roskam said.
Leaders from military and veterans service organizations joined Sens. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., Kelly Ayotte , R-N.H., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., at a press conference to urge the Senate to replace a provision in the budget proposal that cuts retirement benefits for veterans. Wicker, Ayotee, and Graham earlier called for a bipartisan solution to replace the $6.3 billion in cuts to military retiree benefits.
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.