Sen. Mike Johanns said he sees little chance of a "grand bargain" in 2012.
Sen. Mike Johanns (R-Neb.) — a key cheerleader of last year’s bipartisan deficit reduction efforts — said this week that he sees little chance of reaching a “grand bargain” in this presidential election year.
“I think that the chance of a budget package moving this year is very, very slim,” Johanns said in an interview. “I don’t think the president wants to deal with that before November, let’s be honest here.”
With little Republican outreach from President Barack Obama as the election approaches, Johanns hopes a GOP victory in the presidential race will jump-start the move toward deficit reduction.
“I think [Obama will] talk like he wants to deal with it, I think he wants to put out some sense of urgency, but I don’t think you are going to see a serious attempt by the White House to get behind something, whether it’s the ‘gang of six,’ or Simpson-Bowles,” Johanns said. “We’ll see what happens after November, but I don’t see much chance that that moves at all.”
Johanns was a backer of the gang of six Senators who tried last year to craft a bipartisan deficit reduction deal that dealt with spending cuts, entitlement reforms and the tax code. But Senate Democratic and Republican leaders have rebuffed those efforts to freelance on the deficit reduction issue, and as a result, the group’s efforts have been stifled.
The gang of six is “not snuffed out, but it’s definitely flickering,” Johanns said.
Republicans have been quick to point out that the White House did not endorse the plan developed by the bipartisan deficit commission established by Obama in 2010 and headed by former Clinton administration Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles and former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.). Congressional leaders from both parties were similarly lukewarm to the commission’s findings. The Simpson-Bowles plan called for at least a $4 trillion cut in the deficit over 10 years by tackling entitlements, spending and tax policy.
Johanns believes that Obama has developed a habit of not having to reach out to Republicans because Democrats controlled the House and eventually gained 60 votes in the Senate when he came into office.
“It just wasn’t necessary,” Johanns said. “It wasn’t good for the country, and I don’t think that was especially good for Barack Obama because there was going to be a day when it would change. It did change. ... So at the end of the day ... they have to figure out how to work with us.”
Johanns, a former governor and former mayor of Lincoln, Neb., suggested Obama sit down with his critics in the Senate and find out how to work with them.