- Republican Wins Money Race in New York Special
- Congressional Hits and Misses: Week of April 20, 2015
- Pelosi Reacts to Death of Al Qaida Hostages
- Pelosi Calls Emerging Trade Deal a 'Pothole'
- Freshman's Campaign Issue Gets D.C. Attention
These are stressful times for congressional staff. In the past three years, congressional offices have seen their budgets cut by up to 20 percent. This has resulted in a significant reduction in performance bonuses and reduced staff size through attrition or furlough. Smaller staff size means the remaining staff have to do more with less. Additionally, the government shutdown affected all congressional offices and many congressional staff are experiencing changes to their health care benefits. While the implementation of the new health care exchanges has yet to occur, any change in employee benefits results in anxiety and stress.
The Congressional Management Foundation saw this stress quantified in a survey of congressional staff that we conducted in partnership with the Society for Human Resource Management. When asked their reaction to the statement, “I have too much to do to do it well,” 48 percent of policy/legislative/research staff agreed while 28 percent disagreed.
The behavioral science community defines stress this way: “When a person perceives that demands exceed the personal and social resources the individual is able to mobilize.” Pretty much describes a Capitol Hill staffer to me. So how can managers help their staff and themselves?
Managers’ options fall into two categories: action oriented and emotionally oriented.
The most obvious action-oriented strategy is to reduce stress through a reduced workload. (I sense a gigantic “fat chance of that!” reaction among Capitol Hill readers.) But there actually are some steps one can take. When faced with a work overload, managers can postpone deadlines, compromise goals or standards, or add resources.
Postponing deadlines means identifying those activities or projects that do not need to be completed now. (Side note: the member demanding that something “needs” to be done does not necessarily constitute an actual need.) This could include: bill introductions; certain proactive recess scheduling; and (gasp) turn-around response time to constituent correspondence.
Compromising goals or standards means identifying objectives or processes where the team could make minor alterations that would yield benefits in employee morale and productivity. These could include: reducing or eliminating one or two of the member’s strategic goals for the year; reducing the length of talking points or speeches (force the boss to speak extemporaneously once in a while); and changing the length or structure of weekly reports on staff activity. (The CMF hears occasional grumbling about these weekly memos on each staffer’s activity, and staff frequently question whether anyone actually reads them).
Adding resources is the hardest choice to employ, as Congress is cutting your budgets. But is your office fully utilizing graduate fellows? Is your intern program strategy to hire the most qualified college juniors and seniors who can commit to a specified time period? Or do you offer as many internships as possible (to maximum political benefit with key stakeholders) and end up with the local mayor’s son and biggest campaign contributor’s niece — who goof off for the entire summer at Camp Congress?
Emotionally oriented strategies seem easier, as they require no direct resources. But, in fact, they are sometimes harder to implement because they require managers (and the member) to slightly alter behavior.