Feb. 9, 2016 SIGN IN | REGISTER

House Committee Threatens to Subpoena FEC Records

Ryan Kelly/CQ Roll Call File Photo
Rep. Gregg Harper, chairman of the House Administration Subcommittee on Elections, on Thursday told the Federal Election Commission to turn over key documents or risk a subpoena.

After a seven-year lapse in oversight, the House Administration Committee has renewed its interest in policing the Federal Election Commission — and among its first actions could be issuing a subpoena.

On Thursday, at the first House Administration Committee oversight hearing on the FEC since 2004, Subcommittee on Elections Chairman Gregg Harper (R-Miss.) said the agency has refused to make public its enforcement guide, the schedule of penalty formulas for fine proceedings and its manual outlining how officials police those who break election law — called the Reports Analysis Division manual.

Harper told the six FEC commissioners testifying before the panel that they would have 10 business days to turn over the documents before the full panel exercises its subpoena authority to compel the commission to do so.

“To be clear, this is the second and last time we will ask for these documents. The third request will be in the form of a Congressional subpoena,” Harper said. “Your unwillingness to release these documents contradicts and ultimately hinders your agency’s core mission [and] makes your praise of transparency seem disingenuous.”

It is unclear whether the FEC will be able to turn over the documents in time, though the commissioners expressed willingness to see if it were possible.

The penalty schedule has not been formally updated in many years, the commissioners explained. Rather, updates exist in the form of internal memos and emails. They also emphasized that each case is idiosyncratic and there is no cut-and-dry approach to penalties, contrary to what an official document might suggest. Releasing a document suggesting that such an approach exists might lead to confusion, they fear.

The FEC is also prone to partisan and philosophical deadlock, with three Democratic and three Republican commissioners who need a majority consensus to move on any measure.

“We don’t always agree on what the schedule should say, and there have been many debates where commissioners do not agree on what the penalties should be,” said Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub. “I have long advocated that this should be made public.”

While releasing the penalty schedule could be feasible, disclosing the RAD manual is likely to meet internal obstacles as some commissioners believe it contains information that must remain secret.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?