- Kathleen Matthews Joins Race for Van Hollen's Seat
- Let Voters Judge Early Ads
- Kelly Wins Runoff for Mississippi House Seat
- DNC's Mo Elleithee Leaving Politics for Georgetown
- Rematches Invite 'Retread' Label, Familiar Themes
Last week, the Peace Corps celebrated its 52nd anniversary. As two of five returned Peace Corps volunteers in the House of Representatives, we can, without question, say that the Peace Corps changed our lives, our perspectives and now our missions as members of Congress. One of us having served in El Salvador and the other in Somalia, we returned to the United States fundamentally transformed.
We were motivated by the very American ideal of service — service to our neighbors, near or far, in need of a helping hand. This is what motivated Sargent Shriver’s work when he became the first director of the Peace Corps, as well as when he founded Volunteers in Service to America, the domestic equivalent.
The effect of our time in El Salvador and Somalia was profound, and we would encourage every young American to consider serving in the Peace Corps or with a domestic service organization. Aside from the personal influence programs such as the Peace Corps can have on the individuals who volunteer, selfless charity is exactly what the world needs.
The Peace Corps is rightly oriented toward helping the global poor in the far reaches of the developing world. But even here in our own American backyard, there are ample service opportunities for young people to make a difference and many low-income neighborhoods that need a helping hand.
But service is what’s important, and donating one’s talents and time to those less fortunate should be supported. Shriver recognized this. Poverty is reduced through service, and Shriver’s commitment to spreading American good will is why he was charged with tackling this nation’s first war on poverty. Foreseeing a serious threat facing America, internally and externally, Shriver helped organize the Peace Corps, VISTA and other service-based programs to address poverty here and abroad.
Now, 52 years later, his message is as poignant as ever. Poverty is not political, nor is the need or call for service. Helping our neighbors through public service, whether on this continent or another, brings a broad spectrum of benefits, from boosted self-esteem to a bolstered sense of security. It serves the greater good of our community and theirs. And it sends a message to other countries that the United States is a charitable global partner.
Going forward, more is needed to boost the Peace Corps. To better tackle emerging global crises, we need the Peace Corps to be stronger, better, bolder and more diverse.
By stronger, we need to recognize that the benefits of a robust organization that uses eager and talented volunteers ready to travel to unfamiliar and potentially dangerous countries to offer their service are immeasurable. And we should be encouraging returned volunteers to stay connected with the Peace Corps and continue to serve after their official duties have ended.
By better, we can continue to improve the Peace Corps by equipping our volunteers with the technological and cultural expertise that they need to be successful in their placements. Peace Corps placement, then, becomes not only a service opportunity but also an informal internship that results in a more knowledgeable individual capable of putting their experience to use post-service.