- Why was Fiorina Denied Ad Time During the Debate?
- What the Hell Happened to Jeb Bush?
- Pelosi, DCCC Use Tea Party to Fire Up Dem Voters
- Anti-Abortion Groups to GOP: Include Fiorina in Debate
- Obamacare Repeal Votes Motivate Democratic Donors
The emotionally charged legislative and policy debate over gun control is morphing into a fight between adherents of the First and Second amendments to the Constitution.
The gun lobby, looking to deflect some criticism in the wake of the Connecticut school massacre, has been quietly working its talking points with lawmakers and staff to focus on broader societal influences, such as violent video games and entertainment.
“This is exactly what the gun lobby and conservative senators will do to deal with this problem,” said Mark Glaze, a lobbyist at the Raben Group, who represents Mayors Against Illegal Guns. “They will want to blame this on a culture.”
The National Rifle Association, which has been publicly silent since the shooting and has refused requests for comment, is holding a news conference in Washington on Friday to tout what it calls “meaningful contributions” to prevent future tragedies.
Members of Congress, including some who support a ban on certain assault-style rifles, have targeted the entertainment and video-game industries as part of the problem. Sen. Joe Manchin III, D-W.Va., an ardent gun rights supporter who early this week said it was necessary to look at all options, turned his focus to video games later in the week. He noted a specific game — “Grand Theft Auto” — and singled out its New York City maker, Rock Star Games, in an interview with West Virginia Metro News.
Some argue that the game “glorifies these horrible crimes,” Manchin said, adding that maybe the games should be banned. His home-state colleague Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., has introduced a bill to study the effects of violence in video games on behavior.
The Supreme Court has ruled that a California ban on selling or renting video games to minors was unconstitutional. Gabe Rottman, legislative counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union, said that “absolutely yes,” video games are covered by the First Amendment’s free-speech protections.
“Violent video games are kind of a convenient scapegoat, and I think the industry and, more generally, people who care about free expression would get engaged,” Rottman said.
In a statement responding to the tragedy and specifically to Rockefeller’s proposal, the Entertainment Software Association said: “The search for meaningful solutions must consider the broad range of actual factors that may have contributed to this tragedy. Any such study needs to include the years of extensive research that has shown no connection between entertainment and real-life violence.”