Feb. 7, 2016 SIGN IN | REGISTER

EPA's Biofuels Proposal Creates National Security Risks | Commentary

The RFS-2 fight is a fight for America’s energy future, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. We can continue to embrace the status quo, committing to a future that would maintain our single-source dependence on oil without regard to the economic and national security implications. Or we can choose a different energy future, one where we embrace policy action to drive the growth of advanced fuels — such as biodiesel — that diversify our energy options and make sure we can maintain the strongest fighting force in the world.

As someone who served this country, I choose the latter.

I call upon the Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider the proposed reduction targets and continue moving forward with robust policies that provide alternatives to our dangerous dependence on oil and strengthen the renewable fuels industry in America. When it comes to creating a more secure energy future — and at a time when these clean, homegrown fuels are taking off — we shouldn’t be hobbling the industry.

Brett Hunt is a former captain in the U.S. Army. He is an active supporter and spokesman for the clean energy campaign Operation Free.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?