Gray said he intends to push legislation that would allow undocumented immigrants to apply for driverís licenses in D.C. Even though the D.C. proposal taps on the hot-button issue of immigration, members of Congress donít seem likely to invest themselves in defeating it.
With the Senate preparing to begin formal debate on a massive bill to overhaul the nationís immigration system, the nationís capital is pursuing immigration legislation of its own.
Last week, D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray announced his intent to push legislation that would allow undocumented immigrants to apply for and receive driverís licenses.
ďThis legislation puts us in the vanguard of a national movement to help not only immigrant communities but also our entire community by making our city a safer and more just place,Ē Gray said in his weekly radio address on May 5.
D.C. would join five states ó Utah, Washington, New Mexico, Illinois and D.C.ís neighbor, Maryland ó that have already adopted laws to give individuals driving privileges even if they cannot prove their legal residency.
Ordinarily, it would seem to be somewhat risky for D.C. government to explore legislation relating to a hot-button issue thatís already on Congressí radar. Congress, after all, has the final say over whether local laws can or canít be put into effect, either by passing a disapproval resolution within a certain time window or through policy riders.
Some key lawmakers involved in drafting immigration overhaul bills in the House and Senate say they donít support giving driverís licenses to undocumented immigrants. It could be problematic as they work toward a bipartisan, bicameral, comprehensive immigration deal that will inevitably have to contain concessions and compromises to pass muster with various stakeholders.
But in conversations with CQ Roll Call, members on both sides of the aisle suggested that the D.C. legislative push isnít on their radar and that even those on Capitol Hill who oppose giving driverís licenses to undocumented workers are not likely to invest themselves in the issue or in what the D.C. Council could pass as early as this summer.
One of the members of the Senateís ďgang of eight,Ē John McCain, R-Ariz., said it was ďnot on the top of [his] list of priorities.Ē
Another member of the group, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said that while he ďpersonally oppose[s] it,Ē he did not anticipate the issue coming up in the overall debate that will kick off at the Judiciary Committee on Thursday.
Even lawmakers who are quick to assert their right to legislate to the District of Columbia said they didnít feel strongly about this particular issue.
Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., is the chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and has cited Congressí ďconstitutional authorityĒ over the District in cases where he has sought to curb abortion practices in D.C.
In the 112th Congress, he introduced legislation that would ban abortions after 20 weeks in D.C. It failed to get the two-thirds majority required to pass on the House floor under suspension of the rules, and he said he plans to push for the billís consideration again this year.
He suggested, however, that his interest in D.C. affairs ended at the abortion debate: ďIím the Constitution chairman, so I gotta pay attention to these sort of things, but otherwise I donít have any specific focus on D.C. at all,Ē Franks told CQ Roll Call after describing his concern with the Districtís lack of restrictions on when abortion can be performed. As for driverís licenses for undocumented immigrants, he said only that he generally was unsupportive.
On the opposite side of the issue, a handful of House Democrats who support the initiative in D.C. and in the other five states said they donít expect the issue to come up in any prominent way when discussions about an immigration overhaul begin on the House side.
ďGiven the positive nature of the discussion and the uplifting debate that weíre having, I donít think thatís gonna happen,Ē said Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez, D-Ill., one of the chamberís key players in drafting the chamberís immigration proposal. ďI donít foresee it as a problem.Ē
Visitors get their first look at the American Veterans Disabled for Life Memorial, which opened to the public on Monday, Oct. 6, 2014. The new memorial is located off Independence Ave. SW between the Rayburn House Office Building and HHS. Buy photo here.