Feb. 11, 2016 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Democrats Take Pains to Avoid Rand Paul's Pakistan Amendment

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call

Updated: 8:40 p.m.

Senators cut a deal tonight that will allow them to take a five-day break instead of working at unusual hours through the weekend.

Under the agreement, procedural votes expected to start at 1 a.m. Friday will be put off until Wednesday, with the clock accelerated on a veterans' jobs bill that Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was prepared to work on through the weekend to get around an objection from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

The deal came after Reid made it clear that he would take any action needed to avoid a vote on a Paul amendment cutting off aid to Pakistan.

"I respect the interest of the Senator from Kentucky in relation to Pakistan, Egypt, Libya, but every now and then the Senate should be able to focus on a small good thing," Reid said, in reference to the package of veterans' jobs proposals pending before the chamber.

"I just think my friend from Kentucky maybe should have run for secretary of State rather than the Senate," Reid said Wednesday night as the standoff with Paul came to a head.

This in not the first time the Pakistan amendment has been blocked through procedural maneuvers. Paul tried to get a vote on a Pakistani aid amendment during June debate on the Senate's farm bill, but Reid rebuffed that effort as well. Paul wants to cut off aid to the country until it releases Shakil Afridi, a Pakistani doctor who provided assistance to the U.S. in the runup to the killing of Osama bin Laden.

For his part, Paul said he is willing to work with Reid to set up a short-time agreement for voting on the amendment.

"Billions of dollars have been squandered in Pakistan. Pakistan then tortures the man who helped America get bin Laden. And we do nothing. I have asked for 15 minutes to vote on this issue - 15 minutes," Paul said Wednesday night. "No one is obstructing this for any sort of personal vendetta. I am more than happy to work with the majority. I care deeply about the veterans. I care deeply about housing and helping the veterans who have fought for their country. But this is about whether we as a country and the American taxpayers will be asked to send good money after bad to allies that are not acting like allies."

Other Senators, however, have criticized the wisdom of not only Paul's proposal, but also of voting on it without a full debate on Pakistan. Something there is no time for given the compressed Senate schedule before lawmakers depart for the November election.

Foreign policy votes always have the potential of being misinterpreted both at home and abroad. Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) pointed out the size and scope of the Pakistan issue in a brief interview earlier this week.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?