Twenty years ago this week, President Bill Clinton made the Family and Medical Leave Act the first bill he signed into law. It was a huge and meaningful victory ó a step forward for a country undergoing massive demographic and workforce changes, made infinitely more challenging because our public policies lagged far behind.
Itís not often that a law has both an immediate and lasting effect. But this one did. The Family and Medical Leave Act allows many employees who have been working for at least a year for an employer with 50 or more workers to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave to care for a new baby or for a child, parent or spouse who has a serious health condition. It also allows unpaid, job-protected leave for workers who need to address their own serious health problems.
In these 20 years, working men and women have used it to take leave 100 million times. Those leave-takers are fathers and mothers who have cared for new babies. They are women who needed medical help during complicated pregnancies. They are parents of sick children who were at hospital bedsides to help their little ones recover. They are adults who took time off to care for sick or dying parents or spouses.
They are people in Connecticut, Maryland and every state in this country who are much better off because when they took leave under the FMLA, their health insurance continued and their job was there when they were ready to return.
The fight to pass the FMLA was long and hard. Organized business interests vehemently opposed the legislation and blocked it for many years. We prevailed because we knew it was right for the country and we would not give up ó and we prevailed because of the steady and skilled leadership of the National Partnership for Women and Families, which drafted the legislation and built a broad, durable, dedicated coalition that saw it through.
In the years after the FMLA became law, none of our opponentsí sky-is-falling predictions ever came true. In the years after Clinton signed it, businesses did well, and our economy thrived.
Something else happened, too. The countryís culture changed. The prospect of family-friendly workplaces came into focus. It was no longer an unimaginable dream but rather something to look forward to. It was not yet here, for sure, but it finally seemed within reach.
A few years ago, we cheered when the FMLA was expanded to provide additional support to military families. But that isnít the only expansion we need.
The FMLA covers only about half of this nationís workers. It doesnít cover those who work part time, people at small firms or those who have been at their current jobs for less than a year. It doesnít allow for leave to care for an adult child, a domestic partner, a grandparent or sibling. It doesnít allow leave to address domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking. And it does not provide the financial security that many workers need to be able to take leave.
Twenty years after the FMLA became law, itís time to help realize the vision of a family-friendly America by addressing those gaps. That means expanding the FMLA to let more workers take leave for more reasons, and it means adopting a paid-leave insurance program.
One of us fought in Congress for many years to pass the FMLA. The other is still in Congress now, fighting to expand it. We are from two different states, two different political parties. But we both know that the FMLA has been a huge success ó the first step on the road to a family-friendly nation. And we are both convinced that itís time to take the next step. The country deserves nothing less.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro, a Democrat, has represented Connecticutís 3rd District since 1991. Former Rep. Constance A. Morella, a Republican, represented Marylandís 8th District for 16 years.
Terri Henderson, 6, center, whose mother is El Salvador, attends a rally with members of Congress at Union Station's Columbus Circle to announce the Restore Opportunity, Strengthen, and Improve the Economy (ROSIE) Act on July 29, 2014. The legislation provides incentives for government contractors to pay a living wage and other benefits that would help low-income workers.