Norton expressed skepticism about the constitutional and legal standing of a referendum on D.C. budget autonomy, but she is holding off on commenting until receiving clarity from the House’s and Senate’s parliamentary offices.
Proponents of greater budget autonomy for Washington, D.C., breathed a sigh of relief this week as they marked the end of Congress’ 35-day review period for a referendum giving the D.C. Council more control over local funds.
With neither chamber taking action to overturn it, the charter amendment allowing the city to set its own fiscal calendar and determine how it spends locally raised funds becomes law effective Jan. 1.
But supporters are still hoping for an all-clear from Congress on their progression down the path toward self-determination.
“It would be easier for all of us — congressional leaders, as well as District leaders — if Congress were to affirmatively approve what we’ve done,” Council Chairman Phil Mendelson said.
Mendelson worked with DC Vote and DC Appleseed, organizations that advocate for increased autonomy for the District, to secure a spot for the referendum on the April ballot, when it won the support of 83 percent of D.C. voters.
DC Vote Executive Director Kimberly Perry said her organization was “cautiously celebrating” but is aware that Congress still holds the authority to overturn any decisions made at the local level.
Mayor Vincent Gray and D.C. Attorney General Irvin B. Nathan, who both expressed skepticism about constitutional and legal standing, had no comment on adoption of the amendment. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., who also expressed skepticism, is holding off on commenting until receiving clarity from the two chambers’ parliamentary offices.
A recent report by the Republican majority of the House Appropriations Committee, endorsed by Speaker John A. Boehner, signaled that GOP leaders are also doubtful of the amendment’s muster. The committee “considers the recent referendum in the district as an expression of the opinion of the residents, only.” The panel approved its fiscal 2014 Financial Services appropriations bill, which contains district funding, on July 17.
The Senate Financial Services and General Government spending bill, which contains District funding, took a different tack. The bill summary said “the annual bill approves the District’s annual $12 billion local operating budget.” It makes no mention of the budget autonomy referendum. The Senate Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Subcommittee approved its version of the bill on Tuesday. The full committee is scheduled to approve it Thursday.
If the city moves forward with implementing budget autonomy, its local budget would still undergo a 30-day congressional review period like ordinary council legislation, but the city would not require an affirmative vote of Congress before spending local tax dollars. And D.C. could work on its own fiscal timeline, free from the budget standoffs and shutdown threats that frequently embroil Congress.
Terri Henderson, 6, center, whose mother is El Salvador, attends a rally with members of Congress at Union Station's Columbus Circle to announce the Restore Opportunity, Strengthen, and Improve the Economy (ROSIE) Act on July 29, 2014. The legislation provides incentives for government contractors to pay a living wage and other benefits that would help low-income workers.