- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
After last year’s intense debate of an anti-piracy bill, any legislation dealing with Internet security faces an uphill climb.
That point was made clear today by House Intelligence Chairman Mike Rogers, who was careful to point out differences between his bipartisan cybersecurity legislation and last year’s failed online piracy bill that was crushed after an all-out lobbying campaign from Internet companies and users.
“Apples and oranges,” the Michigan Republican told reporters in a conference call today when asked whether his legislation, which encourages private companies and the federal government to share information related to cybersecurity threats, might face a similarly grim fate as the Stop Online Piracy Act that was killed last year.
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the ranking member on the Intelligence panel, also made an economic case for the bill.
“When these hackers steal intellectual property, they take new high-paying jobs along with all the other damages that we do have,” the Maryland Democrat told reporters.
Rogers and Ruppersberger were careful to focus on the security and economic aspects of the bill and highlighted the coalition of supporters they have built through dozens of meetings held last year. Rogers repeated during today’s call that his bill, which was approved 17-1 in committee last year, is only 13 pages long and was the result of dozens of meetings with private companies, industry groups, Members and staff. He noted that the bill limits the information that may be shared and is solely focused on fighting terrorism in cyberspace.
“We spent those hundreds of meetings trying to come to a place where we could all agree that our civil liberties are protected and we allow sharing of information with the people who get up every day in the private sector,” Rogers said.
Rogers’ focus on building up a network of support may have also come from last year’s contentious debate over the annual defense authorization bill. The typically bipartisan measure met staunch opposition from both conservatives and liberals over detainee provisions, and Rogers was among the key Republicans to calm Member concerns and help pass the bill.
But after the SOPA mess, one telecom lobbyist said: “There’s a fear about any Internet bills now. Barring the worst with a real cyber threat, I don’t see how it can move.”
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) was the lone Member to vote against the Rogers measure in committee last year, and so far Democratic leaders have not weighed in.
Sources say that Democrats on the House Homeland Security Committee are largely opposed. Ranking member Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said in a statement that “while promoting information sharing on cyber threats is urgently needed, I am concerned about the approach taken in the Rogers bill, as approved by the Intelligence Committee, and its potential implications on Americans’ privacy and civil liberties.”