Nov. 26, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Roll Call Casualty List: See Which Incumbents Lost | Check Results Here With Our Interactive Elections Map | Sign Up for Roll Call Newsletters

Conservative Goals Could Stymie Some GOP Health Care Law Efforts

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call
Hatch has introduced bills to repeal the law’s individual mandate and the requirement that employers provide health insurance to employees.

Conservative groups and some lawmakers are pushing Republicans to focus on legislation that would ruin the health care law’s implementation — a strategy that complicates efforts to pass any other kind of health care bill.

Some conservatives balked earlier this month at voting on a bill from the GOP leadership that would have extended part of the law, and now the House will instead vote Thursday on fully repealing the law.

Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, said the 70 new House Republicans had asked for a chance to cast their votes on the law (PL 111-148, PL 111-152). But the vote also serves to reassure conservative groups that Republicans are focused on dismantling the overhaul they call Obamacare.

Dan Holler, communications director for Heritage Action for America, said his group supports voting on full repeal but also wants Republicans to focus on bills that would damage the law’s implementation.

“We’re sort of weary of anything that takes the focus away from halting the implementation,” he said.

“You cannot allow the Medicaid expansion to go forward. You cannot allow the exchanges to go forward, because people get brought into the system and they expect a certain benefit from the government,” he added. “And once that happens, it is very hard to take it away.”

Republicans should concentrate, Holler said, on legislation that strikes at the heart of the law rather than bills that would strike individual, unpopular provisions but allow the main part of the law to go forward.

“It’s one thing to go after IPAB, which is obviously a very popular target for good reason, but that doesn’t necessarily stop Obamacare from going into law,” he said, referring to the law’s Independent Payment Advisory Board, which is tasked with constraining Medicare spending growth.

Andy Roth, vice president for government affairs at Club for Growth, agreed, saying he expects “something big” on the law to happen now that some Democrats are raising concerns about its implementation.

“The club obviously supports full repeal,” Roth said. “There are various partial repeals that we would support, like getting rid of the Medicaid expansion, getting rid of the exchange subsidies, the individual mandate.”

Rep. Matt Salmon, R-Ariz., has introduced legislation to repeal the law’s funding for state Medicaid expansion (HR 1404) and to eliminate the subsidies for consumers buying insurance in the law’s health exchanges (HR 1908), but neither has seen committee action yet.

Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, said Republicans can’t be expected to fix the law by getting rid of the unworkable provisions and helping its implementation. He said he expects the law’s costs to “explode” next year if Congress doesn’t stop substantial parts of it.

comments powered by Disqus

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?