House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa said the National Capital Planning Commission and the D.C. Office of Planning will study possible changes to D.C.'s Height Act of 1910.
More than a century since it was enacted and just four months since a hearing was held to review it, Congress has requested a major study of the law that limits the scale of buildings in the District of Columbia.
House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), said Thursday that the National Capital Planning Commission and the D.C. Office of Planning will work jointly to deliver to Congress a study on what changes to the Height Act of 1910 might be appropriate and feasible.
The study, which Issa requested in an Oct. 3 letter, will explore “potential changes in height limits to various parts of the city,” according to a summary proposal submitted to Issa on Nov. 1.
“The study will be guided by the following principles: ensuring the prominence of federal landmarks by preserving their views and setting; maintaining the horizontality of the monumental city skyline; and minimizing the negative impacts to national significant historic resources,” the summary states.
Issa requested that the D.C. agencies propose revisions to the Height Act that would “support local economic development goals while taking into account the impact on federal interest, compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods, national security concerns, input from local residents and other related factors.”
The NCPC agreed to the terms Nov. 1. It anticipates beginning the study in December, with a draft proposal released to the public in the summer of 2013. It has set a deadline of September 2013 to adopt a final plan.
The news comes months after Issa, who has emerged as one of the District’s greatest allies on Capitol Hill, convened a hearing to discuss whether some provisions of the Height Act should be reconsidered for the 21st century.
Currently, building heights in business areas are mostly limited to the width of the adjacent street plus 20 feet. There is also a general height limit of 130 feet, extended to 160 feet along parts of Pennsylvania Avenue.
Issa has said that it should be possible to add floors to some buildings while maintaining the District’s unique low skyline. There could be economic and commercial benefits, he said, to allowing developers to build higher.
“As time has elapsed and opportunities for economic growth in our nation’s capital continue to present themselves, this study will help Congress and local leaders evaluate the case for expanding existing boundaries for vertical growth,” Issa said in the press release announcing the study.
Norton, who has always faced a challenge balancing interests in Congress with those in local government, had said she supports exploring Height Act revisions but not without extensive review and consultation with D.C. leaders and constituents.
Roll Call has launched a new feature, Hill Navigator, to advise congressional staffers and would-be staffers on how to manage workplace issues on Capitol Hill. Please send us your questions anything from office etiquette, to handling awkward moments, to what happens when the work life gets too personal. Submissions will be treated anonymously.