- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
ďSo, what do you do?Ē
Iíve gotten used to the reaction I get when I answer that question. Given my lack of gray hair, itís usually one of surprise.
Iím 27 years old, and Iím a lobbyist.
Weíve all heard the saying that young people run Capitol Hill, but over the past five years Iíve come to realize just how advantageous my age actually is in my profession. In fact, I sometimes think it might be harder for older lobbyists to get things done.
While theyíre throwing down $1,000 in the hope of grabbing a memberís ear for five minutes at a fundraiser, Iím in the Fairgrounds outside Nationals Park, having a beer with some friends before first pitch. Inevitably, many of those friends are Hill and administration staffers ó people I roomed with in college or met last weekend at a friendís birthday party.
The most useful strategies I develop often comes out of these kinds of off-campus interactions with staffer friends. When we start nerding out over possible bill co-sponsors at our monthly poker game, for instance, we know we donít have to filter our ideas ó which means we can be more open, bold and innovative. These ideas arenít always perfect, but the number of times a key strategy or piece of intel has come out of casual discussions during poker or Sunday football would probably surprise you.
Of course, staffers are the people who actually get things done in D.C., which is why working with them is so productive. Theyíre the ones who bust their butts to understand issue complexities and intricacies ó all while working for outrageously little money. Members are drinking from a firehose.
The best part of my job is working with the Hill to devise strategy ó and helping staffers understand how this strategy will affect decision-making outside D.C. Itís not always easy to make that impact known on Capitol Hill, to show members the effects their decisions (or lack thereof) have in the rest of the country.
Take renewable energy tax credits, for example. The credits for wind projects were set to expire Dec. 31, 2012 (the credit was extended by the fiscal cliff deal), the others at the end of 2013. There was strong bipartisan support for extending the credits in both chambers. But the attitude on the Hill (on this and any number of other issues) was reactive, not proactive; Congress waited until the very last minute to talk about whether and how to extend these credits.
In the meantime, renewable energy projects require months of lead time for permitting and planning. Outside the Beltway, companies have to decide whether to sink millions of dollars into a project for which they might not be able to claim a tax credit six months down the road. No CEO worth his or her salt would move ahead with such uncertainty, so projects were put on ice and the associated jobs disappeared ó just in time for the holidays.