Schumer is working on both immigration legislation and a gun control package and his success on those issues could play a role in his political future.
Schumer has been seen as the lead on immigration because of his status as the Judiciary panel’s immigration subcommittee chair.
Reid’s decision to move on the background check bill has added some urgency to Schumer’s efforts. And Leahy recently complained about the delay in revealing the immigration group’s bill, warning that he may not be able to take it up until May if the legislative language isn’t finalized soon. Plus, President Barack Obama, who has so far deferred to Schumer’s immigration group, has repeatedly warned that he will not let negotiations drag on without weighing in with his own proposal at some point.
But whether he is successful in his current endeavors, Schumer is clearly building sustainable bipartisan bridges.
Appearing together at a Politico Playbook breakfast in late January, Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona, who is part of the immigration group, compared Schumer to Kennedy, who was famous for working across the aisle, in his effort to get legislation passed.
“I think that Sen. Schumer is assuming that role,” McCain said. “The trait that Sen. Schumer and Sen. Kennedy share, is one, you know exactly where they stand, number one. And number two, they will never change. They will never go back on their word. Those are the keys to success in the United States Senate.”
“If we get ... enhanced background checks out, it’ll be because of the work that Chuck Schumer and I and Joe Manchin did, if we get one,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said in an interview with C-SPAN’s “Newsmakers” set to air Sunday. “There are great relationships in the Senate.”
It is much less likely at this point that anything gets done on gun control, though Schumer still is working to achieve that. The current base bill that Reid has said he would bring up was written largely as a placeholder for whatever Schumer’s group could come up with. Even if those negotiations produce a bipartisan compromise, there’s still no guarantee any bill can overcome a filibuster that would likely be joined by members of both parties.
It’s therefore the immigration effort that is most important for all stakeholders, including Schumer.
As chairman of the immigration subpanel, Schumer was not aggressive in the last Congress in holding hearings on immigration. Over the course of two years, the panel held just seven hearings, including a 2011 session on securing America’s northern border and a 2012 meeting on the “economic imperative for promoting international travel to the United States.” The most significant hearing on immigration policy likely was a July 2011 session on the “economic imperative” of enacting legislation, the only session explicitly devoted to comprehensive changes.
One reason for the relative dearth of hearings is that Republicans had not yet shown an interest in taking up a comprehensive overhaul. Instead, Schumer reached out to former House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, to work on an agreement on high-skilled workers visas, sources said.
That deal never materialized, but following Obama’s re-election — which was achieved in part through his outsized advantage with Latino voters — GOP members began to see a need to work on a comprehensive bill that might help their standing among Hispanics.