April 24, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Click Here to Register for Our Next Webinar Tuesday on Midterm Elections

Can Obama Regain His Lost Leverage on Spending?

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo
How much money Obama gets to implement his agenda will come down to whether the president will finally use his veto power to bring House Republicans to heel.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest, asked Aug. 19 by CQ Roll Call about Boehnerís earlier vow that the sequester will stay until Obama agrees to smarter cuts and changes, would not detail the White Houseís strategy. But he hinted that the presidentís signature shouldnít be taken for granted.

ďThe president is not going to sign a budget agreement that undermines important investments, that doesnít act in the best interest of middle-class families in this country,Ē Earnest said.

And Earnest questioned whether Boehner could actually hold the line on the sequester, noting House leaders had to pull an appropriations bill from the floor before the August recess because they didnít have the votes to sustain the cuts.

ďSo for the speaker of the House to stand there and insist that heís going to stick to that seems, at best, unreasonable, considering he doesnít have the support of his own party to do it,Ē Earnest said.

The Obamacare defunding push complicates Boehnerís position ó both because it undermines the speakerís aim to pin shutdown blame on the president and because it could force him to bargain with Democrats for votes just to get a bill out of the House.

There are other questions for Obama.

Will he offer up a new compromise of his own? And will he continue to insist on tax increases as part of any plan to replace the sequester?

White House aides tried to cobble together a deal with rank-and-file Senate Republicans in months of informal talks, but those efforts reached an impasse Thursday, predictably over taxes.

ďThe president has always been clear that closing tax loopholes that benefit the wealthy had to be part of any big deal,Ē a White House official said.

That statement seemed to leave room for a smaller deal that could avert the sequester in the short run without a tax increase, which may be the best outcome the president can expect.

The two parties are about $70 billion apart. Boehnerís short-term bill would allow spending to continue at this yearís $988 billion level. Democrats and the White House want to spend $1.058 trillion. Under the Budget Control Act, spending would be cut to $967 billion if the sequester isnít replaced by Jan. 1.

Obamaís predicament can be traced to the New Yearís Eve fiscal-cliff deal, where with a stroke of his pen he signed away much of his legislative leverage.

Republicansí top priority ó making the Bush tax cuts permanent ó was accomplished for 99 percent of Americans. They even won relief on the estate tax, permanent relief of the alternative minimum tax and assorted other tax breaks. And while Obama secured higher rates for the wealthy, he no longer had a tax trigger of any kind to hold over the GOP.

The West Wing miscalculated that deep defense cuts would get Republicans to quickly agree to another tax increase as part of a deal to replace the sequester, despite warnings to the contrary from Senate Democrats.

The spending bill isnít the only challenge facing the president, of course.

The debt ceiling will be hit in mid-October, potentially a few weeks into a possible government shutdown, and both sides are already playing maximum hardball.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?