Nov. 24, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Roll Call Casualty List: See Which Incumbents Lost | Check Results Here With Our Interactive Elections Map | Sign Up for Roll Call Newsletters

Bipartisan Seating Backers Press On Despite Increased Rancor

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo
Sen. Mark Kirk plans to sit with Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin at this year's State of the Union address.

Like a slowly budding romance, advocates of bipartisan seating at the State of the Union insist Capitol Hills latest feel-good exercise is more than just empty political symbolism and helps lawmakers develop lasting, effective cross-party relationships.

But since the practice was first introduced for last years annual presidential address to Congress, Democrats and Republicans have fought bitterly over almost everything. The government nearly shut down in the spring, soon after President Barack Obamas 2011 State of the Union, and risked a default in the summer when the two parties nearly failed to agree on raising the debt ceiling.

Still, proponents of bipartisan seating, while conceding its short-term failure, havent lost faith.

Social connections lead to policy changes, Sen. Mark Kirk said Wednesday in a telephone interview. Last year, the Illinois Republican sat with Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.); this year Kirks State of the Union date is Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), whom he called his best friend in the Senate.

Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.), who spearheaded the bipartisan seating arrangement in 2011, defended the practice as productive. He said Members from opposing parties have few other opportunities to interact. Udall and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who plan to sit together during Tuesday evenings speech, are advocating that bipartisan seating be adopted permanently.

Udall said it is important to show the country at such a high-profile event that the two parties are capable of getting along, if only for an evening. Im realistic, he added. I understand that one night sitting together in the House chamber wont bridge the philosophical differences between us.

The idea for bipartisan seating at the State of the Union was hatched last year by Third Way, a centrist Democratic think tank, in the wake of the January 2011 shooting that targeted Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) during a constituent event in Tucson, Ariz. The idea caught on as a way to reduce partisan tensions following the hard fought 2010 elections.

This year, more than 100 Members have found dates from the opposite party for the State of the Union, and many have signed a letter to Congressional leaders requesting that partisan seating, in which Democrats and Republicans sit on opposite sides of the House chamber during the presidents address, be ended. But exactly what bipartisan seating might accomplish tangibly remains unclear particularly in an election year in which control of the Senate is at stake.

comments powered by Disqus

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?