In todayís digital world, social networks such as LinkedIn are vital for professional success. A strong network of friends and colleagues can break down barriers and open doors, and it is often the surest way to find a job, land business and build a career.
In the global economy, networking is critical for countries too. By linking economies and reducing impediments to commerce, trade agreements can boost economic growth, open up business opportunities and support better jobs for workers.
When America networks on trade, we succeed. More than 45 percent of U.S. goods exports go to the 20 countries with which we have trade agreements, including Canada and Mexico, our biggest export partners. And our trade with these partners tends to be more balanced. In recent years, America has had trade surpluses in manufactured goods and services with our trade agreement partners.
But America still has considerable trade networking to do, especially in forging stronger links with the fast-growing economies in East Asia ó a region that will add over a billion new middle-class consumers in the next decade and import an estimated $10 trillion in 2020 alone.
The 10 Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries (including Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand) now are linked by a growing network of trade agreements with six major economies in their region ó China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand. Together, these 16 nations have recently launched negotiations on a Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which would further integrate them in a single trade bloc. As these countries reduce trade barriers with each other, impediments to American trade will loom even larger. Our manufacturers and farmers will lose access to these growing export markets, and service providers will find it even harder to compete in Asia.
Meanwhile, the United States currently has trade agreement links with only three countries in the region ó Singapore (2004), Australia (2005) and Korea (2012). While these landmark agreements support growing trade and help sustain American jobs, they alone arenít sufficient to establish a robust U.S. trade network in East Asia.
Americaís relative lack of trade links to Asia is one reason we have underperformed in the contest for trade to this growing region. According to a new Third Way analysis, the U.S. share of trade into East Asia plummeted by more than 42 percent between 2000 and 2010. Of 15 major economies trading into East Asia, we were dead last in growing market share. (During the same period, China and Korea grew their shares by 14 percent.) If this trend continues, by the year 2020, America could be missing out on almost $1 trillion annually in potential trade ó trade that could support some 5 million U.S. jobs. And America will continue to lose out on business in a wide range of sectors. For instance, despite $3.7 billion in California exports to India in 2011, precious stones and metals made up 53 percent of all products ó all other commodities combined totaled only $1.8 billion.