A military commander’s authority to overturn the decision of a court martial dates back to the Continental Army. But the Pentagon’s top lawyer on Wednesday acknowledged that there is “something that seems odd” about such arbitrary power in the wake of an Air Force general’s decision to overturn a jury’s guilty verdict against a pilot accused of sexual assault.
Robert S. Taylor, the Pentagon’s acting general counsel, told the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel that Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel tapped him to review whether a commander’s authority to overturn decisions is still necessary.
Taylor’s preliminary report and any recommended changes to the power of the “convening authority” — used under U.S. military law to refer to a commander’s job — are due on Hagel’s desk by March 27.
But in a rare public show of discord between civilian defense leaders and military brass, lawyers from all of the military services balked at any efforts to take away commanders’ power, arguing that doing so would hurt their ability to enforce “good order and discipline” within their units.
“I think for so long as we hold our commanders accountable for everything that a command does or fails to do, then they must have these types of authorities,” Maj. Gen. Vaughn A. Ary, Marine Corps staff judge advocate, told the panel.
The resistance from the services prompted an immediate backlash from Personnel Subcommittee Chairwoman Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., who convened Wednesday’s marathon hearing that included testimony from several sexual assault victims who described the prevalence of these crimes as well as the difficulty of reporting assaults and navigating the military’s judicial system.
“I appreciate the work that you are doing [on sexual assault]. I honestly do,” Gillibrand said. “But it’s not enough. And if you think you are achieving discipline and order within the current convening authority framework, I am sorry to say you are wrong.”
The decision by Lt. Gen. Craig Franklin to overturn the conviction against Lt. Col. James Wilkerson, a former inspector general at Aviano Air Base in Italy, has reignited passions on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers have been working for several years to pass laws aimed at ending what they believe is an epidemic of sexual assault within the military.
Top military leaders have said they have set a “zero tolerance” policy on sexual assault and are working to better protect victims and change the culture. But victims who testified Wednesday before the panel painted a picture of a military where sexual assault is a common occurrence, crimes go unpunished, and perpetrators get promoted.
“Many of the women who were impacted by these incidents, including me, are no longer in the military,” said Anu Bhagwati, executive director of the Service Women’s Action Network and a former Marine Corps officer who said she experienced daily discrimination and sexual harassment. “However, all of the officers who were complicit in covering up these incidents have since retired or are still serving on active duty.”
The Defense Department estimates that 19,000 service members are victims of sexual assault each year. But only a small fraction — about 2,700, or 14 percent — actually report these crimes, underscoring the fact that many victims fear retaliation if they seek legal action.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., speaks with reporters following a vote in the Senate. Gillibrand’s proposal to remove military commanders from the process of reviewing sexual-assault cases was left out of the bicameral deal on the defense authorization bill, but the senator is pushing for a vote on her plan soon.
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.