The Senate Armed Services Committee broke Senate rules last week when it closed to the public a vote to hold its defense authorization bill markup in closed session.
Before the May 21 markup began, CQ Roll Call discovered the doors to the committee room on the second floor of the Russell Senate Office Building were locked as staffers and senators entered the room through a side office. Inside, all individuals who entered the room were checked for clearance before the vote to close the markup occurred.
Despite the fact that the vote took place behind closed doors, committee chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., insisted that it was a public vote because the Armed Services Committee publishes the roll call once the markup concludes. Levin’s press secretary Tara Andringa said it would not be practical to open the room to the public for the vote because the Capitol Police must conduct a security sweep of the room before classified information can be discussed, a process that she says can take several hours.
“Once the room is swept, only those with the appropriate security clearance can be in the room,” Andringa said. “To address the Senate rule, the committee releases the result of the vote on whether to close the session.”
But according to the Standing Rules of the Senate, a motion for a committee to go into closed session must be “followed immediately by a record vote in open session.”
The decision to close the vote comes at a time when the committee has already faced criticism from reporters and transparency advocates for holding its defense authorization markup in closed session while the House Armed Services Committee holds its version in public.
“I can’t imagine why they close even the vote to close it. That just seems ridiculous,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. “And if they’re not marking up classified information, the real question is why any of it shouldn’t be opened up to the public.”
Levin also defended the practice of closing the markup as a matter of practicality that prevents the committee form having to repeatedly clear the room whenever classified material is brought up. He told CQ Roll Call that the committee discussed classified information twice during last week’s markup. However the House Armed Services Committee completed its NDAA markup earlier this month without discussing classified information at all.
“We’ve been long concerned about the lack of public participation allowed in this process,” said Angela Canterbury, director of public policy at the Project on Government Oversight. “We think that the claims of national security concerns are quite overblown because naturally the House is able to segregate the small amount of classified information that’s in the NDAA and deal with the vast majority of the bill in a completely open process. So why can’t SASC?”