July 22, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Join the Roll Call Book Club July 23 for a discussion with Brigid Schulte, author of "Overwhelmed." Click here to register.

AOC Draws Sexual Harassment Suit

An Architect of the Capitol employee is suing her agency for allegedly tolerating several years of sexual harassment.

April Davis on Monday filed a lawsuit with the civil division of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. She is seeking $300,000 in “compensatory damages for extreme embarrassment, humiliation and mental anguish,” which she says she endured for nearly eight years at the hands of her supervisor, Sterling Thomas.

Suing on counts of sexual harassment and hostile work environment, quid pro quo sexual harassment, and retaliation, Davis also wants “an award of economic damages to include back wages, lost overtime and, where appropriate, offsets for wages, retirement and other benefits, plus interest.”

“What can a vulnerable woman do when the decision-makers are predominantly male who are insensitive to her victimization?” Donald Temple, Davis’ attorney, asked Roll Call. “In spite of her complaining and complaining and complaining, she was Ralph Ellison’s proverbial ‘invisible woman.’”

According to her formal complaint, Davis was first hired by the AOC as a time and attendance clerk in February 2003. In the spring of 2004, upon announcing that she was pregnant so soon after the birth of another child, she alleges that Thomas asked, “Did you even wait six weeks?”

Davis reports that from this moment on, “a long period of condescension and disrespect” began. The complaint describes how Thomas allegedly denied her paid leave when she or her son had medical difficulties but suggested he would help her in exchange for sexual favors.

She charges that he would often offer financial assistance, and in one case a bottle of cognac, followed by the question, “What are you going to give me?” Davis also alleges that Thomas would also touch her inappropriately and stand too close to her.

The complaint does not describe in any graphic detail the nature of Thomas’ alleged advances, only that he always “solicited sexual favors” after allegedly dangling a promise of more money or paid leave before her.

Davis said she repeatedly rebuffed Thomas’ advances, and it led to his refusals to sign off on various requests for medical leave or overtime pay. Meanwhile, she says he was giving preferential treatment to other female employees who did respond well to his solicitations.

She first filed a complaint with the AOC’s Equal Employment Office, and Thomas allegedly told her it was a waste of time. When that mediation was not successful, Davis brought her case to the Office of Compliance, the second step certain legislative branch employees must take before they may file a lawsuit in court.

Earlier this year, the office closed the case, unresolved. In the meantime, other officials within the AOC did little, Davis says, to help her, and they retaliated against her for her efforts to bring the issue to light.

“They did an excellent job,” Temple said of the Office of Compliance staff. “The mediator was extraordinary. But I think the AOC did not give this real meaning. It trivialized [Davis’] victimization as a woman and as a victim of sexual harassment.”

comments powered by Disqus

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?