An anti-union construction trade group is targeting three vulnerable House Republican freshmen with a barrage of negative advertising over a series of labor-friendly votes.
Reps. Jon Runyan (N.J.), Joe Walsh (Ill.) and Robert Dold (Ill.) already face tough re-election battles that could be complicated by a spate of online ads from the Associated Builders and Contractors accusing them of breaking campaign promises.
The trade association, which helped fuel the Republican takeover of the House in 2010 with more than $1.1 million in campaign contributions, is trying to counter an executive order issued by President Barack Obama it contends gives unionized contractors an unfair advantage in bidding wars for federal projects.
The House will vote next week on language that would bar federal agencies from requiring outside contractors to agree to a single set of employment standards for a construction project. The pacts are known as project labor agreements.
The measure is modeled on legislation introduced by Rep. John Sullivan (R-Okla.) that the association helped write and could come up as part of the military construction authorization bill as soon as Thursday.
The association says all three Members pledged to support such legislation in a 2010 questionnaire. Since coming to Washington, D.C., they seem to have had a change of heart.
“Getting here and doing the exact opposite led us to take an action that we normally wouldn’t: taking ads out against the Republican Party,” said Geoff Burr, the group’s senior vice president for federal affairs.
The association wrote checks to Runyan and Dold for a combined $12,000 last cycle, but this time around it has given only $3,500 to the pair, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Walsh, however, has never benefited from the group’s largesse and his office came out swinging at the ad campaign.
“Congressman Walsh has never promised anything to ABC,” said Justin Roth, Walsh’s chief of staff, said in a statement. “He has told them the same thing that he has told labor groups. Which is he does not support the government mandating or prohibiting the use of PLA’s. ... If there was a vote to make PLA’s mandatory he would oppose it, just as he votes against measures to forbid them.”
The ads, which will run through the end of next week and cost more than $100,000, also target Reps. Judy Biggert (R-Ill.) and Mike McIntyre (D-N.C.).
Supporters of the PLAs say they streamline complex projects, ensuring a constant supply of qualified workers and mitigating on-site conflicts over who does what job.
Tom Owens, a spokesman for the building and construction department of the AFL-CIO, said that non-union companies can still win contracts under the agreements and that the ABC is just trying to weaken organized labor.
Roll Call has launched a new feature, Hill Navigator, to advise congressional staffers and would-be staffers on how to manage workplace issues on Capitol Hill. Please send us your questions anything from office etiquette, to handling awkward moments, to what happens when the work life gets too personal. Submissions will be treated anonymously.