- Kathleen Matthews Joins Race for Van Hollen's Seat
- Let Voters Judge Early Ads
- Kelly Wins Runoff for Mississippi House Seat
- DNC's Mo Elleithee Leaving Politics for Georgetown
- Rematches Invite 'Retread' Label, Familiar Themes
The House partially failed an audit of its 2009 finances and will likely fail again for 2010, according to Congressional testimony Thursday, shedding new light on why former Chief Administrative Officer Dan Beard abruptly quit last summer.
The embattled former House officer resigned July 1, one day after an independent auditor informed members of the House Administration Committee that the chamber would fail the internal controls part of its financial audit for the first time in more than a decade.
The fiscal 2009 finances themselves were clean, but the auditors found “mismanagement and disengagement and at times obstruction” at the top rungs of the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer, which dragged the audit out for 14 months, resulting in increased contractor costs, House Inspector General Theresa Grafenstine said in her testimony.
“The CAO did not have effective controls over financial reporting,” causing “greater risk of not detecting an error in financial statements,” Grafenstine said. The auditing process “takes a whole lot longer because you can’t rely on the internal controls.”
Told for years that he needed to implement an internal oversight program over the financial reports, Beard neither listened not cooperated, according to the audit.
“I listened, but I have no comment,” Beard said, when reached by telephone.
Paired with a 2010 IG report that found low morale, miscommunication and turnover in the CAO’s Office of Payroll and Benefits and Office of Financial Counseling, as well as appropriators’ move to withhold $20 million from Beard’s budget last year, the new report paints the clearest picture of how tensions between Beard and Congress climaxed and resulted in his departure.
“The financial audit wasn’t a stand-alone issue,” said CAO Dan Strodel, Beard’s replacement, who at the time of the audit was a House Administration Committee staffer. “There were others that were percolating that came to a head at the time.”
Cotton & Co., an independent accounting firm, audits the House books each year. For several years, the firm had told Beard that he needed to implement bureaucratic controls similar to Office of Management and Budget methods.
By the time of the 2009 audit, however, the firm found Beard had made no move toward installing such a system, though he had said he would.
In January 2010, they told Grafenstine that the CAO did not have adequate management-level oversight over its financial records. Grafenstine called an emergency meeting, followed by several weekly sessions with CAO staff. Beard, however, refused to participate in any of the sessions, Grafenstine said.
In March 2010, the IG told Members that the House would likely fail the internal controls portion of the audit, House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight ranking member Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) said at the hearing.
That month, Beard met with the committee staff director and assured him that he understood the seriousness of the problem. But months later, he had still taken no action.
On June 30, the auditor handed down a poor report on the chamber’s finances, Lofgren said. Beard met with committee members July 1 and resigned the same day.