March 3, 2015 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Danker: How the CFPB Got the Fed’s Lunch Money

A few weeks after Dodds rollout, former Clinton White House Council of Economic Advisers chairman and current Brookings Institution senior fellow Martin Baily wrote that anything other than a stand-alone agency would upset liberals, but Dodds version looks like a clever ruse to use the Feds deep pockets as an independent source of funding for the bureau. With the budget showdowns that became a fact of life after Republicans took control of the House the next year, insulating the CFPB from the regular appropriations process proved to be a prescient way to keep it off the chopping block.

For Corker and Shelby, the Fed appeared to be a way of keeping the CFPB from running amok as they thought it would under Obamas proposal. As the New York Times reported, Republicans and Wall Street wanted, instead, for consumer protection to be woven into regulation of financial firms soundness. Corker eventually offered to create an independent consumer agency within the Federal Reserve but limit its ability to enforce its rules.

The thinking that an association with the central bank would depoliticize consumer regulation was misguided. The Fed, like the National Labor Relations Board and other independent institutions, has increasingly submitted to the presidents agenda. Chairman Ben Bernankes bond-buying has enabled the Obama administration to fund trillions in deficit spending at suppressed interest rates. Republicans are naïve if they still see the Fed as a buffer to the administrations fiscal irresponsibility the way they did when Alan Greenspan was in charge during the Clinton administration.

Senate Republicans, including Corker and Shelby, did not end up supporting Dodd-Frank, but they did grease the skids for its worst feature an unrestrained financial regulator funded with the Feds unlimited checkbook.

Better understanding of the Federal Reserve Systems political exposure could have prevented this mistake. Beyond bringing the CFPB back under Congresss appropriations power or even repealing Dodd-Frank, the GOP should focus on scaling back the Fed, not lengthening its tentacles.

Rich Danker is economics director at American Principles Project.

comments powered by Disqus

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?