- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
President Barack Obama could make history with his second nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court by nominating another woman to the high court, a decision many female Senators said they would welcome.
I would think that would be an excellent idea, Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) said. Weve had what, three women in the whole history of the country? Were more than 50 percent of the population.
While Obama is expected to select his high court pick any day now, White House officials continue to dodge questions about when to expect an announcement.
The president will announce his choice in due course, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Wednesday. Im not going to get into characterizing where we are in the process, except to say that the president is in the midst of reviewing a number of very impressive candidates.
Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden have personally met with and interviewed four potential nominees over the past week: Solicitor General Elena Kagan and federal appeals judges Merrick Garland, Sidney Thomas and Diane Wood.
Other female nominees whose names have been floated include Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm (D). There has been some speculation that Obama may be preparing to tap another woman to join justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor.
If Obama were to nominate another woman and the Senate confirms her, it would mark just the fourth woman who has served on the court in history, joining Ginsburg, Sotomayor and retired Justice Sandra Day OConnor. Additionally, it would be the first time that three women have served on the court at one time, bringing the court much closer in line to the nations demographic makeup.
I absolutely think it would be appropriate to add another womans voice to the court. ... Decisions are best made when everyones voices are represented at the table, especially the highest court in the land, Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) said.
Beyond a better reflection of the nations demographics, Landrieu also noted that over the past several decades women have entered the legal profession in droves and now outnumber men in law school graduation rates. Its been a real sea change in terms of the depth of the pool of talent, she said.
National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn (Texas), who serves on the Judiciary Committee and was a member of the Texas Supreme Court, agreed. There are a lot more women lawyers these days, Cornyn said. There are a number of highly qualified [women], including Diane Kagan and Elena Wood.
However, some female Democratic Senators said that while they would welcome another woman on the court, they believe its more important that Obama chooses a qualified candidate who will make sure the court remains focused on issues such as fairness, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said.
Boxer, who prior to Sotomayors nomination in 2009 joined Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) in urging Obama to pick a woman, said she ultimately wants the White House to pick the strongest person. If it is a woman, wonderful. But if its a man ... who brings together the progressive side of things, then Ill certainly support that, she said.
On Wednesday, the president also met with influential Judiciary Committee Republican Sens. Kyl (Ariz.) and Orrin Hatch (Utah) to discuss the nomination process, among other topics. Hatch later urged the president to pick a consensus candidate.
It shouldnt be someone who substitutes their own personal views for the law of the land, and who refuses to follow the Constitution of the United States. A judicial activist would be a poor and unnecessarily divisive choice at any time, Hatch said in a statement.