- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
House appropriators announced Wednesday morning that they would reject all earmark requests that benefit for-profit companies.
We dont want for-profits involved, Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) said after meeting with House Democratic leadership. It means there will be 1,000 fewer earmarks.
Obey said he would hope that the policy would break the appearance of a link between campaign contributions and earmarks.
But, he said, You will never break totally the appearance of a possibility of a nexus as long as the Congress doesnt pass campaign finance reform legislation.
Many of those earmarks have been for defense-related firms.
The move comes a week after Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) floated the idea of a total ban on earmarks. It also comes as GOP lawmakers consider a yearlong ban of their own.
Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Wednesday that his Members would convene a special meeting Thursday to talk about the possibility of a Conference-wide earmark moratorium.
Im talking about a real moratorium, Boehner said. Theres no way to be half pregnant on this issue.
Under the Democratic proposal, the Appropriations panel will also require audits of at least 5 percent of all earmarks directed to nonprofit entities. This new measure is to ensure that earmarks go to their intended purposes and prevent for-profits from masquerading as nonprofits, said a joint statement from Obey and incoming Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense Chairman Norm Dicks (D-Wash.).
In lieu of earmarks, Obey and Dicks said they would set up a new program to be run by the Defense Department that will fund projects that could go to for-profit businesses, particularly startups.
Obey said that the new policy was not intended to be a one-year experiment but a long-term practice.
The vast majority of earmarks, however, already go to nonprofits and would not be affected.