- Why Was Fiorina Denied Ad Time During the Debate?
- What the Hell Happened to Jeb Bush?
- Pelosi, DCCC Use Tea Party to Fire Up Dem Voters
- Anti-Abortion Groups to GOP: Include Fiorina in Debate
- Obamacare Repeal Votes Motivate Democratic Donors
Senate Democratic leaders are seriously considering employing rarely used Senate rules against dilatory motions and amendments to thwart Republican attempts to drag out debate on health care legislation, several Democratic sources acknowledged.The move could be considered the Democrats version of the nuclear option, given it would likely be seen as a serious weakening of the minoritys right to offer amendments on a bill that cannot be filibustered because it would move under special reconciliation rules.Senate rules prohibit dilatory amendments and motions once the chamberhas broken a filibuster or invoked cloture, but there do not appear to be any specific rules pertaining to how many amendments or motions can be offered under reconciliation. However, Senate Democrats are likely to argue that reconciliation rules prohibit a filibuster, and that offering an endless stream of amendments is an attempt to get around that rule.One Senate Democratic leadership aide cautioned that no decisions had been made, but said, While abiding by the rules of the Senate, were prepared to do what we can to move the bill.Senate Republicans have made no secret of their plan to try to trip up the Democrats strategy for passing a health care bill this year. That plan entails forcing potentially weeks of amendment votes both as an attempt to alter the bill and to stall a final vote. However, some sources said they doubted Republicans would have the stamina to force such a stretch of nonstop Senate voting, and that Democrats may never need to draw on the rarely used rules.The Democrats strategy for clearing health care legislation would require House approval of a comprehensive health care measure the Senate passed on Christmas Eve. But because the Senate lost its filibuster-proof supermajority after that vote, changes demanded by the House would go into a second budget reconciliation measure that cannot be filibustered and requires only 51-votes for passage. That legislation also would have a 20-hour limit on debate. Votes on amendments, however, are unlimited, and previous reconciliation debates in the Senate have featured multiple days of nearly nonstop voting in what has become known as a vote-a-rama.House and Senate Democrats have been aiming to complete the process before they leave for a two-week Easter recess on March 26.In order to cut off the Republicans amendment strategy, sources saidDemocrats would likely allow voting on amendments to go on for a couple of days. Once it was clear the GOP amendments were failing routinely and intended to be dilatory, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) would appeal to the chair, which would be occupied by Vice President Joseph Biden whose constitutional role includes serving as President of the Senate to rule specific amendments out of order.Democratic sources said there is a well-established principle in the Senate of getting around delay tactics. One key precedent they point to is the 1977 fight over a natural gas regulation bill. At the time, Sens. Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio) and James Abourezk (D-S.D.) were mounting what was known as a post-cloture filibuster. The Senate had agreed, 77-17, to invoke cloture, or limit debate on the bill, but for 12 days and one full night the two Senators filed amendment after amendment, forced readings and demanded quorum calls.