- Why Was Fiorina Denied Ad Time During the Debate?
- What the Hell Happened to Jeb Bush?
- Pelosi, DCCC Use Tea Party to Fire Up Dem Voters
- Anti-Abortion Groups to GOP: Include Fiorina in Debate
- Obamacare Repeal Votes Motivate Democratic Donors
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from ex-Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.) and will not revisit constitutional Speech or Debate Clause protections.
Attorneys for the former Louisiana lawmaker asserted in court documents that the Justice Department violated the Constitutions Speech or Debate Clause when prosecutors provided a grand jury with evidence of Jeffersons legislative activities in order to obtain an indictment in 2007.
But the Supreme Courts refusal to hear the Louisianans appeal upholds a November 2008 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which rejected Jeffersons appeal, although it did not rule on whether Speech or Debate violations existed. Instead, the appellate court stated that it was barred ... from looking behind an indictment to assess whether the grand jury had considered privileged legislative materials.
Jefferson is charged with 16 counts of violating federal law for allegedly offering and accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes to promote business ventures in West African nations. He is seeking the dismissal of the corruption charges.
He is scheduled to go on trial June 2 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.