- Edwards Releases Senate Fundraising Totals
- Academics Say Higher Education Prepared Them for Higher Office
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: The Mountain Region
- Top Races to Watch in 2016: New England
- Top Races in 2016: The Midwest
After being labeled the "party of no for" months by Democrats who accused them of offering up no new ideas, House Republicans unveiled a bold budget proposal Wednesday that attempts to repair their partys tattered claims to fiscal responsibility.
The blueprint announced by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the ranking member on the Budget Committee, comes a week after GOP leadership received bipartisan ridicule for unveiling a proposal that didnt include a single number.
Ryans plan takes an ax to President Barack Obamas budget, slicing $4.8 trillion in spending over the next decade, ditching economic stimulus spending, enacting sweeping new cost controls on Medicare and Medicaid, and offering up a host of new tax cuts for businesses and individuals.
We have a plan to get our debt under control, Ryan said.
The alternative offers a far more conservative outline than past Republican efforts, and is cheered conservatives who have yearned for something concrete to support. It remains unclear, however, whether the blueprint offers Republicans enough of a rally point for a party revival or whether its call for tough fiscal medicine will turn off voters worried about their economic security.
The Democratic budget proposal is expected to move toward final passage today, with little question over its passage.
Republican leaders have panned the Democratic plan for spending too much, taxing too much and borrowing too much, and are whipping Members against it, but not whipping for the GOP alternative, said Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), the Chief Deputy Whip.
The biggest issue for Republicans in sticking together at todays vote rests with their moderates, who may balk at measures contained in the GOP blueprint, which includes a five-year freeze on domestic discretionary spending. Last year, 38 Republicans opposed Ryans budget proposal.
A lot of the middle-of-the-road Republicans are thinking of voting against it, Rep. Jo Ann Emerson (R-Mo.) said.
Emerson said that the GOP proposals numbers were not even adjusted for inflation and that it was a pretty hefty lift. But she added that she had yet not read Ryans blueprint.
Democratic leaders and the White House argued that the GOP plan represents more of the same policies of cutting taxes for the wealthy that marked the Bush administration, but they said they were nonetheless happy that Republicans have started putting ink to paper. Last week, GOP leaders unveiled a 19-page summary document that shed little light into the specifics of their plan.
I dont think that there is a better example of the differences of where the president is and the direction hes trying to set and the failed policies of the past, Rob Nabors, the deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, said in a conference call with reporters.
But Republicans noted the White Houses aggressive reaction as a sign that they are making progress. The White House is worried because Republicans have a better solution, and the American people know it, said Michael Steel, spokesman for House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio).
Ryans budget still assumes $6 trillion in borrowing over the next decade, but thats $3.3 trillion less in red ink than Obamas plan.