Dec. 27, 2014 SIGN IN | REGISTER
Download CQ Roll Call's Definitive Guide to the 114th Congress | Sign Up for Roll Call Newsletters | Get the Latest on the Roll Call App

Senators Frame Spending Debate as Shutdown Vs. Economic Disaster

File Photo
Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander said the GOP’s goal is not simply to make the case for smaller government, but to explain its benefits.

Senate Democrats and Republicans took home the competing messages of government shutdown and economic collapse for the Presidents Day recess, setting the stage for an epic fight over a House-passed continuing resolution when they return next week.

The parties’ chief messaging strategists, Democratic Policy and Communications Center Chairman Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), armed Senators with talking points as they departed Capitol Hill on Thursday evening. Senators will spend the recess building support for their starkly opposing positions on the continuing resolution to fund the government from March 4 through Sept. 30.

The legislation, which the House passed 235-189 early Saturday morning, would cut spending by more than $100 billion below President Barack Obama’s 2011 request, including funds for many programs that have long been untouchable.

The Senate’s Democratic majority regards the proposal as essentially dead on arrival and is warning that Republicans are risking a government shutdown. The continuing resolution that is currently keeping the government running expires March 4, and Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Thursday that he would not move another stopgap measure at current spending levels if the House and Senate can’t agree in time.

Republicans are quick to note that they are not advocating for a shutdown. Their focus is on the nation’s 9 percent unemployment rate, and they are seeking to associate reductions in federal spending, debt and the deficit with the private sector’s ability to create jobs. Alexander said the GOP’s goal is not simply to make the case for smaller government, but to explain its benefits.

“Our goal is to help the American people understand what we think they already know, which is that this time, it’s different,” the Tennessee Republican said. “We’re collecting $2.2 trillion per year for the federal government and we’re spending $3.7 trillion, and we have to take steps to reduce that debt if we want to start creating private-sector jobs and put our country on a good path for the future.”

“I think it’s a question of making good choices,” countered Sen. Debbie Stabenow (Mich.), who serves as DPCC vice chairwoman. “We know we have to make tough decisions just like any family does. But we also know what’s important — investing in our own families. You make decisions about owning a home or sending the kids to college because you care about the future. So it’s very, very important that we not throw the baby out with the bath water here.”

comments powered by Disqus

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Want Roll Call on your doorstep?