Proponents of Washington, D.C., home rule are crying foul over a provision in a new anti-abortion bill that they fear is the first step in House Republicans’ attempt to strip the District of its autonomy and revert to old practices.
The GOP leadership-backed No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act would make it illegal to use taxpayer money to fund abortions. But unlike current practice, it classifies any funds appropriated to the District as federal funds. The measure would essentially reinstate a ban on D.C. abortion funding that the Democratic-controlled Congress and President Barack Obama lifted in 2009.
“How hypocritical,” said Ilir Zherka, executive director of DC Vote. “You’ve got the Republican leadership coming into office saying they’re going to reduce the power of the federal government and the third bill they introduce is a bill that would expand the power of the federal government by basically federalizing the District’s policy on abortion.”
He said the bill would be a step above Republicans’ practice when they controlled the House prior to 2007. At the time, riders were added to appropriations bills on a year-to-year basis restricting funds for abortion programs. That procedure was abandoned when Democrats took over Congress in 2007.
“From the District’s point of view, this is the first clear indication of more to come,” Zherka said. “This change in approach to the District is very alarming.”
Zherka added that the group is consulting lawyers to calculate its next move.
Spokesmen for Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), the bill’s sponsor, did not return requests for comment.
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.