The Office of Congressional Ethics as soon as Friday might find itself unable to take up full-scale investigations because House leaders have yet to reappoint the body’s eight-member board for the 112th Congress.
Lawmakers recently renewed the OCE, a quasi-independent body that reviews potential ethics violations and refers investigations to the House Ethics Committee, as part of the internal rules of the House.
Although each of the OCE’s current board members is assigned to a four-year term that does not end until 2013, the House must nonetheless reappoint the board at the start of each Congress, just as it reorganizes its own panels.
The OCE board is scheduled to meet Friday, but if the House does not reappoint its members before then, the office will be unable to initiate new investigations or to refer any pending matters to the Ethics Committee.
“Formally, the ethics board can’t act until they are reappointed because they aren’t on the board,” said Charles Tiefer, a professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law who has served in both the House and Senate general counsels’ offices.
“In the very short term, the board might get by the way the regular standing committees of the House do before they’re appointed, by not taking formal steps but laying the groundwork for immediately taking such steps upon appointment,” he added.
Tiefer said that means the OCE could maintain its staff and continue to do preliminary investigations, which it could return to once its board is repopulated.
In an e-mail Tuesday, OCE spokesman Jon Steinman declined to state whether the OCE had addressed the issue with the House parliamentarian.
“The office has been doing its due diligence on this, as we do on everything,” Steinman wrote. But he added: “I can’t comment on internal processes or deliberations.”
In 2005, a dispute over internal rules prevented the House Ethics Committee, then known as the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, from organizing for several months.
As Roll Call reported at that time, the committee initially curbed its normal functions, declining to issue advice letters or gift rule waivers to Members, for example, about compliance with House rules.
The panel ultimately resumed those functions, however, at the advice of the House parliamentarian.
“I would say that the Ethics Committee ... has had periods of stalemate over the years when, for lack of support from its members on one side of the aisle or the other, it wasn’t able to act,” Tiefer said. “During those stalemates the public has put the House under pressure to get moving again on ethics. The public never seems to like the idea ... that because of the stalemate or gap in the ethics boards or committees, the Representatives are free to break the rules.”
Roll Call has launched a new feature, Hill Navigator, to advise congressional staffers and would-be staffers on how to manage workplace issues on Capitol Hill. Please send us your questions anything from office etiquette, to handling awkward moments, to what happens when the work life gets too personal. Submissions will be treated anonymously.