Any casual analysis of our federal budget picture should raise our financial security threat level to red. We’re borrowing roughly 42 cents out of every dollar, and the future liabilities we’ve shouldered on our children are in the trillions.
Continuing down this path, where debt rapidly subsumes an ever-growing chunk of our economy, is clearly unsustainable — even under the rosiest of budget projections.
Aside from the threat of economic stagnation, many in the national security sphere, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, have suggested that a failure by the U.S. government to tighten its purse strings could have severe implications for our nation’s defense.
While a lot of finger-pointing and revisionist history has surrounded the debate over how we’ve reached this point of no return, the bottom line is that reining in out-of-control spending is our government’s principal financial problem and the most significant challenge before us today. The White House economic team members, save for Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, have packed their bags along with their liberal economic theories and thankfully left town.
However, not before they sold America a failed stimulus bill that never delivered on job creation, supported efforts led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to increase energy bills, and throttled through an irresponsible big-government health care package that neither lowers the cost of health care nor reduces the deficit.
If we continue with their economic plan, Congressional Budget Office estimates federal debt will reach a whopping $20 trillion by 2020, nearly 90 percent of the economy. By that point, the United States will be spending more than $1 billion per day just to cover interest payments, crowding out spending for vital programs such as defense and homeland security.
While the average American family would be hard-pressed to justify charging 90 percent of its income on a credit card, why is the administration holding our country to a recklessly lower standard, tossing our coveted AAA credit rating into the balance and threatening to send our economy into a tailspin?
It is painfully clear that folks in Washington need to get their hands dirty. It’s time to grab a big shovel with a sharp blade to start digging ourselves out of this nearly $14 trillion mess.
Through my role on the Appropriations Committee, I’ve already committed to working with the Budget Committee and the authorizing committees to drop our discretionary spending back down to fiscal 2008 levels — before the TARP and stimulus bills outrageously inflated the baseline of government programs. This action alone will result in $100 billion in savings and restore some sanity to annual discretionary budgeting. But a sweeping reduction in spending is the easy part.
We’ve got to go line-by-line and take an ax to programs that we simply can’t afford.
It will take toughness and resolve, but I believe there are savings to be found in every agency or department budget, however sacrosanct they may be perceived to be.
Earlier this year, for example, I proposed a modest, but targeted, $100 million reduction in Department of Homeland Security spending. Many in my own party criticized me for taking this approach. The past 12 months have obviously seen no shortage of serious terrorist activity, from the Fort Hood massacre to the failed Times Square bombing.
From left, Rep. Christopher H. Smith, R-N.J., David Goldman, the father of a child who was abducted to Brazil by the mother, and Arvind Chawdra, a father whose two children were abducted to India by their mother, attend a news conference in the Rayburn House Office Building on international child abduction.
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.