March 31, 2015 SIGN IN | REGISTER

Obama Must ‘Scare the Hell’ Out of U.S. Over Debt

In 1946, as the Soviet Union moved to subjugate Europe, Sen. Arthur Vandenberg (R-Mich.) famously told President Harry Truman that he had to scare the hell out of the American people to get them to support aid for endangered Greece and Turkey.

On March 12, 1947, following that advice, Truman delivered a speech to a joint session of Congress that persuaded a penny-pinching, isolationist-inclined Republican Congress that Americas well-being required spending $400 million to begin fighting what became the Cold War.

In 2010, its clear to practically everyone whos studied the question that Americas future is endangered by surging debt, but somebody is going to have to scare the hell out of the American people to get real which means painful action to get it under control.

At the same time, this somebody President Barack Obama, for sure, but ideally some top Republican leaders, too needs to make it clear that America can boom again if it gets its fiscal house in order.

In fact, Id bet that a bipartisan pact to cut spending, raise revenue and reform the tax system would inspire such renewed confidence in the U.S. economy and political system that now-uncertain lenders would lend, employers would hire and foreigners would regain respect for America.

On the scare side, the authors of two new commission reports on the debt do use words like unsustainable and unmanageable and quote Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as saying that it represents the single biggest threat to our national security.

In a breakfast meeting with reporters last week, the two co-chairmen of Obamas debt commission used phrases such as devastating and like Greece and Ireland to describe the fate that will befall the U.S. if the debt isnt controlled.

Former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) said that if we dont deal with the debt, the markets will do it for us. And it wont be a slippery slope. It will be swift, and it will be disastrous.

Such words arrest ones attention, but are they enough to persuade the public to pressure Congress to extend the Social Security retirement age to 69 (in 2075), limit Medicare payments, cut the defense budget by $100 billion a year, cap the mortgage interest deduction at $500,000 and raise gasoline taxes?

If the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC poll is any indication, the answer is no and the case needs to be made far more vividly to the public than it has been up to now.

When voters were asked about those ideas put forward by Simpson and commission Co-Chairman Erskine Bowles only 25 percent said good and 45 percent bad.

Sixty percent said they were uncomfortable with Medicare, Social Security and defense cuts, and 59 percent were uncomfortable with increased gasoline taxes, limits on mortgage interest deductions and changes in the corporate tax rate.

As matters now stand, Republicans and many tea party enthusiasts seem to think that deficits and the national debt can be controlled simply by eliminating earmarks or by limiting or cutting domestic discretionary spending of the kind Congress votes on each year.

But earmarks spending sponsored by individual Members of Congress amount to only $18 billion a year, and domestic discretionary spending accounts for only 15 percent of all federal spending.

comments powered by Disqus




Want Roll Call on your doorstep?