roll call logo placeholder image

Editorial

Editorial Archive

Editorial: Page of the Past

Well, at least Republican and Democratic House leaders have agreed on something. But what Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) concurred on last week — abruptly killing the House page program after nearly 200 years of existence — could have been handled much better.

Editorial: Unauthorized

In 2007, when there was a flurry of speculation that President George W. Bush might bomb Iran’s nuclear installations, then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) declared it would be unconstitutional unless authorized by Congress. Obviously, now that he is president, Obama has changed his mind.

Editorial: Money for What?

At $235,000 a year, expense accounts for top Congressional leaders is a sub-pittance by comparison to the federal budget or even the legislative branch budget. Our problem with it is that it’s hard to tell what the money is spent on.

Editorial: Fairer Maps

In several past Congresses, former Rep. John Tanner (D-Tenn.) introduced bills, which we cheered, requiring states to redistrict House seats by independent commissions to avoid partisan gerrymandering. Unfortunately, the efforts went nowhere.

Editorial: Make a Deal

First the good news: House Republican leaders and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid agreed on terms of a two-week spending measure to prevent the government from shutting down at the end of this week. Now the bad news: The deal may not stick and the government may shut down after all.

Editorial: Do Unto Others

For at least a decade now, it’s been a mantra that Members of Congress ought to abide by policies that they prescribe for the rest of the country. But by that standard, the House Republican budget proposal falls short.

Editorial: Just Do It

Here we go again. Campaign finance reports for the fourth quarter of 2010 were due to be filed Jan. 31 — and those from House Members, the Republican and Democratic parties and all their campaign committees were instantly posted on the Web. But not the Senate’s.

Editorial: Rules Fix

It could have gone further than it did, but we’re impressed with the “gentlemen’s agreement” between Republicans and Democrats on Senate rules. It gives us hope for more bipartisan achievements to come.

Editorial: Filibustering

A powerful constitutional, historical and procedural case can be made for doing away with the Senate filibuster. We doubt it’s going to happen, but Senate rules certainly ought to be modified — along with the behavior of Senators of both parties.

Editorial: Beyond Tone

We are encouraged by the response of leaders and most Members of Congress to the Jan. 8 shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and 19 others in Tucson, Ariz. We urgently hope they will live up to their vows to, in effect, detoxify American politics.

Editorial: Aftermath

Congressional leaders and Members are responding with appropriate horror, grief — and dignity — to the assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and the killing of her staffer, Gabe Zimmerman, and five others in Tucson. But outside Congress, a climate of rage persists.

Editorial: ‘Adult’ Congress?

Speaker-designate John Boehner told the New Yorker that “the first really big adult moment” for Republicans will come when it’s time — probably this spring — to vote on increasing the national debt ceiling. Actually, though, the next two years are going to be filled with “adult moments” for the entire Congress.

Editorial: Missing Act

In this unconscionably jam-packed lame-duck session of Congress, one important item didn’t even make it onto the schedule: a revived attempt to pass the DISCLOSE Act, which would make corporate and union campaign expenditures more transparent.

Editorial: Schmethics

It took two years and four months for the House ethics committee to process charges that led last week to the censure of Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) — the capstone of a miserably weak performance in the 111th Congress.

Editorial: Small Symbol

The Senate’s vote Tuesday to continue Congressional earmarks sets up a fascinating legislative and political dynamic inasmuch as the House’s new Republican majority and the Senate GOP minority are determined to forgo them, at least temporarily.

Editorial: Redemption?

Having utterly failed to do its basic jobs — funding the government and setting tax rates — and having done many other things the public resoundingly rejected, the 111th Congress is now faced with enormous challenges of its own making before it passes into history.

Editorial: Promises ...

It’s one of the most dismal rituals in Congress: The minority party bitterly complains about unfair treatment by the majority and promises that, when it’s in the majority, Congress will be run fairly and transparently.

Slideshow |

Back Play/Pause Forward Slideshow Image
Rep. Frank Pallone waits Feb. 8 for the start of a news conference to introduce legislation to keep arsenic and lead out of fruit juices.
See More Multimedia
30 Hill Aides to Know

30 Hill Aides to Know

The clear expectation is Congress will get very little done this election year. But what does get accomplished, at least in the high-profile areas, will largely be the handiwork of an elite group of staffers — who combine policy expertise, political acumen and the trust of their lawmaker bosses to drive much of the legislative agenda.

RollCallPoliticsiPhoneApp_API

SIGN IN




OR

SUBSCRIBE

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.