In a surprising contrast from their hard-line stances during the spending and debt ceiling standoffs earlier this Congress, conservative Republicans, led by Sen. Jim DeMint (S.C.), became the leading voice for punting on a would-be standoff on fiscal 2013 spending.
Their endorsement helped propel a drama-free spending deal announced Tuesday by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid at levels higher than preferred by the right.
But for conservatives, rather than a recognition that spending standoffs are wrongheaded, the move was instead a vote of no confidence that their own leadership had the backbone — or the wherewithal — to wage such a fight so close to the elections.
“We tried our fights last year with funding, to try to cut off funding, cut funding. Cut, Cap and Balance was designed to draw the line on the whole debt ceiling debate. And we were all willing to go to the wall on that. We just did not have enough support here in our own party,” DeMint said.
As conservatives, who convened an informal working group in June, pestered GOP leaders about what their plan was for the fall, they were told to wait until then, when it would be unveiled, a GOP aide said.
Finding the answer unsatisfactory, the group decided punting was the best option, given the circumstances.
DeMint said the debt ceiling standoff hurt Republicans politically “because we didn’t follow through” and that presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney could have been badly wounded by another round with the same dynamics at work.
The reasoning shows that, even amid a recent outcry by Republican moderates demanding a new willingness to compromise, the right flank of the GOP remains unhappy over the deals that were struck and are eager for a harder stance.
But whether Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would hold firm was hardly the only consideration.
The conservatives also factored in a host of other criteria that convinced them they would be playing with a stacked deck for winnings that weren’t worth the ante.
“None of us like the Budget Control Act, none of us like those limits, they’re not enough. We realized there’s nothing we could really get passed better than that here,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said.
“Somehow, we seem to lose those debates in the press,” he added.
They were also worried about adding uncertainty to the economy.
“[The] time to pick a fight on a government shutdown is not now. Our country’s under a cloud of uncertainty. People are losing their jobs. For Congress and the president, who’s been completely irresponsible, for us to have a showdown over a shutdown in September, it was just completely irresponsible,” DeMint said.
“From my standpoint, I thought that’s what the American economy needed,” Johnson said.
Rep. Christopher H. Smith, R-N.J., left, David Goldman, center, and Arvind Chawdra right, attend a news conference in the Rayburn House Office Building on international child abduction. Goldman and Chawdra are fathers whose children were abducted by their mothers and taken abroad.
Each year since 1990, CQ Roll Call has reviewed the financial disclosures of all 541 senators, representatives and delegates to determine the 50 richest members of Congress. This year's report, derived from forms covering the calendar year 2012, shows it took a net worth of $6.67 million to crack the exclusive club.